Saturday, March 21, 2020

Viking Shield Maidens Revisited…


Figure 1: Sample of Weapons Found in the Birka Warrior's Burial



In 2016 I wrote a piece about the roles of women in Pre-Christian Viking culture.  This post was inspired by recent interests in Viking culture, largely promoted by fictionalized television series and other popular culture interests.  At that time archaeological evidence suggested that women in Viking cultures occupied a variety of social roles, including but not limited to the role of warrior.  A year later this conclusion was further supported by new evidence, but there were critics within the archaeological community who were unconvinced.  Today’s blog post will address this latest evidence and how modern cultural views can and do affect archaeological interpretations.

In 1878 the Birka Viking burial was uncovered in Sweden.  This 10th century (900s AD) Viking burial was considered a remarkable find as it contained a high-status warrior’s burial.  This individual was interred with a wealth of grave goods, including several different types of weapons (Figure 1), two horses, a game board associated with military strategies, as well as clothing reminiscent of a high status warrior.  At the time scholars immediately believed that the deceased individual was that of a man because in the 1800s women were believed to have only occupied domestic roles, and therefore it was unfathomable to the scholars that a woman could be a Viking warrior.  As previously reported Viking lore contains several stories of women occupying just that role, but scholars quickly dismissed these as myths, not facts.

In 2017 an article was published in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology that caused quite the stir in the archaeological community.  This article claimed that recent paleogenetic evidence demonstrated that the Birka warrior was not a man as originally believed, but it was biologically a female.  This definitively demonstrated that shield maidens or warrior women did exist in Viking culture and they were not simply a myth.  Unfortunately, there were several members of the archaeological community who did not believe this evidence.  They claimed that the remains that were tested were not of the originally interred individual (a valid concern since the remains had been disinterred over a century previous), and there were also claims that the remains were that of a transgendered individual. 

The two scholars who wrote the original paper reviewed the criticisms and reanalyzed the entire burial, individual’s remains and grave goods included, and they returned in 2019 with a response to their critics in another paper published in the journal Antiquity.  In their latest piece they addressed how the grave goods in the burial demonstrate a high-status warrior, particularly the clothing, which is unique compared to other warrior’s burials.  They also point out that the burials location and the presence of a large stone above the burial made it viewable by land and sea, further supporting the high status of the deceased.  They also retested all of the remains present in the burial and further concluded again that they belonged to one individual and this individual was biologically a female. 

Most importantly, however, was the scholars’ conclusion that it is difficult to assess gender within archaeological contexts.  This is largely due to the effects of modern cultural views being impressed upon interpretations of the past, as well as a gap in knowledge of how the people of the past viewed themselves and what they culturally believed and valued.  They note that while the deceased individual could have been a transgendered individual it is impossible to know.  It is also impossible at this time to know if the Vikings had more fluid gender constructions as compared to our modern gender constructions or if they had multiple gender categories as seen in various cultures around the globe in the past and today. 

Ultimately, the original and follow up studies on the Birka Viking burial underscore a larger problem within the discipline of archaeology and anthropology generally: a lack of objectivity and representation.  It is widely known and acknowledged within the discipline that people are cultural creatures and they follow the cultural values that they are most familiar and comfortable with.  This is not a fault until it affects others, which is the case here with the original conclusion of the Birka warrior in that the original scholars assumed the warrior was a male without considering the possibility of a woman warrior.  The subsequent criticisms to the reanalysis of the Birka warrior also demonstrate how modern cultural ideas can affect archaeological interpretation, further demonstrating a need for greater cultural diversity (or at least more culturally relativistic viewpoints) among archaeological scholars.   Fortunately, the discipline of anthropology is in the midst of a paradigm shift that is encouraging more diverse viewpoints by the inclusion of different individuals into the field, as well as educating and promoting the inclusion of diverse viewpoints in anthropological interpretation.  This situation demonstrates the continued need for this paradigm shift, as well as the positive effects of this shift as it allowed for such conclusions to actually be published in the first place.  As this shift continues I suspect there will be more situations, such as this one, coming up, ultimately enriching our knowledge of the past and present and what exactly it means to be human (in all aspects).

Works Cited

Greshko, M. (2017, September 12). Famous Viking Warrior Was a Woman, DNA Reveals. Retrieved from National Geographic: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2017/09/viking-warrior-woman-archaeology-spd/
Little, B. (2019, March 5). High-Ranking Viking Warrior Long Assumed to Be Male Was Actually Female. Retrieved from History.com: https://www.history.com/news/viking-warrior-female-gender-identity
Solly, M. (2019, February 19). Researchers Reaffirm Remains in Viking Warrior Tomb Belonged to a Woman. Retrieved from Smithsonian.com: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/researchers-reaffirm-famed-ancient-viking-warrior-was-biologically-female-180971541/

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi,
I guess what is interesting to me is the confusion about the remains. I would like to know if the question about the remains will ever be deemed as resolved? Or will scholars continue to write their theories to prove their point to be true? very good read.

Joell Davis

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

Great questions, Joell. Ultimately, it will be up to each individual scholar to synthesize the past, present, and any future evidence that comes along to reach their own conclusions. There will always be individuals who stand steadfastly by their ideals, and the new evidence will make no difference to how they feel. There will be others who take new information into account and consider it carefully in reaching and refining their conclusions.

Anonymous said...

I have a follow up question . If there were women who were warriors did they go out to war with the men ? Did women fight against men or just other female warriors? And if there were two warriors; husband and wife , how was the household typically ran ? Did they have equal roles or was the man still the dominant spouse.
Kennedy Malone

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

Kennedy, I recommend you read the first article hyperlinked in this piece, which discusses the general role of women in Viking culture. Men and women held equal status in the culture, so this would suggest that women fought alongside and against men in battle. Domestic duties were divided equally, as well, although Viking women had some advantages that many modern women do not have. Again, I encourage you to read the original article, which is why I am not spoiling much of that content here in my comment. :)

Unknown said...

I find it amazing how people can stick to that fact that women can't be just as equal as men. also isn't male and female bone structure differ from each other? so how is it so hard to believe that the remains is a female?
-Lavonza Marshall

Melissa Vernon said...

I find Viking history fascinating. Recently, my brother and I received DNA results from a popular ancestry website, and we were completely surprised to see that we had the majority of our DNA was Scandinavian. This finding, plus my interest in the fictionalized show you spoke of, really made me want to learn more about the subject.

Your blog post does a wonderful service to female Viking women, and to the history of women in general. Like Lavonza states, people (history especially) have a hard time reconciling that some cultures held women in a greater esteem than others.

I am glad this woman warrior was vindicated, so to speak, after all these decades!

Melissa Vernon

Ashley Puckett said...

Wow, this blog is very interesting. I don't really know much about Vikings but I do know they are usually portrayed as men especially on TV. I'm weirdly happy that they found this information out because of how people seem to look at men as the more successful sex. Women can do just as much as a man can do physically, mentally, and emotionally. Im proud of this woman warrior.

Unknown said...

Dr. Boston, while reading this post I really learned a lot. Vikings are never something I was interested in, so I have never read anything about them on my own. I find it very interesting that in the 1800's they thought women could not be in position of honor or a warrior. I definitely think we have come along way and women are starting to be seen as more than just domestic roles. I also find it very interesting that just here recently they were able to determine that it was actually a female and not a male that that had originally thought. I think it would be very rewarding to be a scholar that was able to study artifacts like that.

Jessica Salmons

Justin Mitchell said...

I feel like it could be a women, just because they're not typically the one to fight as a viking, theirs always a possibility that one could have.

Kenzell White said...

Great post Dr. Boston. When I was eight grade I had learned a little about Vikings but, I didn't learn about women's role. I find it unfair to look at one sex as higher than the other. This shoul have been proven when in the article the Birka warrior was not a man as originally believed, but it was biologically a female. As a reader I also have to remind myself that this was the 1800's, a totally different time period than what we live in now.

Briana Jones said...

Good read. I think I was even more interested because it seems as though they really wanted to make the conclusion based on past information and prior knowledge over using facts and information right in front of them. Using the remains to determine if it's male or female reminds me of using bone density to determine the diet a person followed. I know this is a bit off topic, but this subject really reminds me of the documentary, The Game Changers, on Netflix. I am vegan now, so I was drawn to the documentary. It talks about how the remains/bone density were used to determine diet. It states that they determined that gladiators followed mainly a plant-based diet. I guess I am reminded of this because I see vikings and gladiators as strong, and both discuss using remains to determine something, in one case gender and the other diet. Either way, I think it is awesome that people are even able to look at remains and learn about the individual.

Danielle Rankins said...

This blog topic was incredibly interesting and informative. Vikings are seen today as a very masculine people so to see there's a femininity within that masculinity is quite interesting and very refreshing. Also, it sheds more light on how gender was seen and portrayed in what some may call a very barbaric people.

Unknown said...

I believe when anything is about a female there's always some type of negativity behind it. Why cant women get the same chances men get and get the up most respect.
-Simone Jordan

Unknown said...

I find it absolutely hilarious that we go out of our way (not necessarily us all) to prove how the theory that men are superior wow females are saying inferior because of their lack of masculinity. Vikings in general are always shown as me I rarely seen a female represented as such. When I was younger I thought it was because Vikings were dirty and females just weren’t going to do it. But as I got older and as I continue to read your blog at hand approves the fact that it’s because they are seen as household keepers. The men were the ones out of savaging they were the forgers they were the ones exploring. With this being said it’s completely understandable how people with this mindset do you watch in their power to keep that mindset alive for example is it really that hard to believe that with the remains are female bone structure does differ especially between the two sexes so maybe, just maybe the reason it was a tad bit different is because it isn’t what you are trying to force it to be

Damia

Unknown said...


I really liked this blog. It taught me that In 1878 the Birka Viking burial was uncovered in Sweden. This 10th century (900s AD) Viking burial was considered a remarkable find as it contained a high-status warrior’s burial..-Josh w