![]() |
| Figure 1: Late Horizon khipu from the University of St. Andrew Collection (Source: Sabine Hyland) |
As previously discussed the quipu (herein referred to as khipu) was a long held “writing” tradition employed by various Andean groups, most popularly among those within the Inca Empire (the Late Horizon Period, 1476– 1534). These knotted cords were mostly made with cotton and animal hair, although some contained human hair. The inclusion of human hair was interpreted as the khipu maker’s (formally referred to as the khipukamayuqs) signature based on ethnohistorical records. The khipu were records of numerical data, typically those related to supply inventories, taxation records, and dates.
Due to the loss of many khipus (due to their purposeful destruction by the Spanish Conquistadors) and the loss of contextual data for many that still remain (as they were looted and removed from their original contexts) there remain more questions about the khipu than there are answers. This also means that it is sometimes difficult to know how to accurately approach the study of khipus to discover more about them. Sabine Hyland out of the University of St. Andrews, however, has been undeterred by these challenges as she has dedicated years of study of the khipu, and her more recent publication provides us greater insights into the who the khipukamayuqs may have been.
According to the Spanish Conquistadors khipukamayuqs were elite males who were trained in Cuzco, the capital of the Inca empire. They were carefully selected for these important roles, which may have allowed the Inca to maintain better control over their empire and its diverse populations of people. This came by way of limiting who could record and maintain the economic and historical data of the empire to only those the Inca royalty had a hand in selecting and controlling. The information provided by the Conquistadors was largely unquestioned despite evidence to the contrary being provided in the Waman Poma, a record of Indigenous life as written by Felipe Guamán Poma de Ayala, a Mestizo (an individual of Indigenous and Spanish parentage). Despite this record being viewed as more accurate of daily life during the Late Horizon and post-Conquest the information concerning the khipukamayuqs was largely ignored because it claimed khipukamayuqs were elderly commoner women, a direct contradiction to what the Conquistadors claimed.
Archaeologists believed the easiest way to resolve this matter was to analyze khipus within burial contexts since these artifacts were often buried with their makers. This was problematic since the khipus that are available for study were without contexts (having been looted), and those that were found within burial contexts were often found in multiple burial situations (as in multiple individuals were entombed with the khipu).
Sabine Hyland took a different approach. She performed isotopic analyses on the khipu housed at the University of St. Andrews (Figure 1), which contained a cord of human hair. She hypothesized that by analyzing the diet of the human hair cord, which served as the maker’s signature, she would be able to discern if this was an elite or commoner based on their diet. Inca elites subsisted on diets primarily made up of meat and maize, whereas commoners ate mostly tubers and vegetables. These would provide distinctly different isotopic signatures. She would not be able to discern sex or gender of the maker, however.
Ultimately, the isotopic data demonstrated that the khipu in the University of St. Andrew collection was manufactured by a commoner. This individual’s diet lacked meat or maize, supporting the notion that they were a commoner. According to ethnohistoric data women were the primary creators of khipus, which was more in line with what the Waman Poma stated. It is believed that while the Inca may have employed elite males to record their state activities khipu making was far more widespread and commonplace than originally believed. This is in line with other archaeological evidence that shows khipus were created pre-Inca Empire. Within the Inca empire commoners may have maintained local records, and this specific khipu may be one of those records.
References
Hyland, S., Lee, K., Koon, H., Laukkanen, S., & Spindler, L. (2025). Stable isotope evidence for the participation of commoners in Inka khipu production. Science Advances, 1-6.
Urbanus, J. (2025, November/December). A Knotty Problem. Archaeology Magazine.


