One of the central areas of study within the field of
linguistic anthropology is the study of endangered
languages. Language loss is a sign
of cultural loss, which is a big deal within the field of anthropology. Language and cultural loss can occur through
a variety of means, but the systematic and purposeful extermination is the culprit
for language and cultural loss among the subject of today’s blog post, the
Uyghurs. This blog post will discuss the
Uyghur language, the Uyghur ethnic group (Figure 1), and the institutional
discrimination leading to their ethnocide.
Figure 1: Map of China, with the Xinjiang province highlighted in red |
The Uyghur people and language reside in the Xinjiang
province of northwestern China (Figure 2).
This is part of the rural hinterlands of the country where many
provinces have some of their own basic autonomy/control. The Xinjiang province is largely populated by
the Uyghur, who are one of China’s largest minority groups (n=11 to 13
million). The Uyghur ethnic group is
descendent from Muslim groups who settled various parts of central Asia,
including adjacent Pakistan, and the Uyghur language is traced back to Middle
Eastern language families. The language
is considered part of the Turkic linguistic family, which further demonstrates
a Middle Eastern ancestry of the culture and language.
Being one of the largest ethnic groups in China the Uyghur
have benefited from the autonomy provided by the Chinese government, which
allows Chinese citizens the legal right to speak whatever language they chose
and provincial governments the ability to identify official provincial
languages. In the Xinjiang province both
Mandarin and Uyghur are officially recognized, with the majority of the Uyghur
ethnic group being very proficient in their native language.
Unfortunately, the Chinese government has been eroding away those rights, particularly ramping up their efforts for ethnic extermination of this ethnic group in the past few years. These initiatives were reported in 2017 when the Chinese government issued a new “bilingual education program” for the entire country. Under this new program Mandarin was to be the primary and only language spoken during instruction, and all other languages spoken in an area were to be taught as second language courses. Anyone caught speaking anything outside of Mandarin was subject to “severe punishment”. The Chinese government rationalized this move by claiming that Mandarin was the language of commerce in China, and by requiring it in curricula meant that Chinese citizens, regardless of ethnic background, would all have equal access for economic success.
Unfortunately, the Chinese government has been eroding away those rights, particularly ramping up their efforts for ethnic extermination of this ethnic group in the past few years. These initiatives were reported in 2017 when the Chinese government issued a new “bilingual education program” for the entire country. Under this new program Mandarin was to be the primary and only language spoken during instruction, and all other languages spoken in an area were to be taught as second language courses. Anyone caught speaking anything outside of Mandarin was subject to “severe punishment”. The Chinese government rationalized this move by claiming that Mandarin was the language of commerce in China, and by requiring it in curricula meant that Chinese citizens, regardless of ethnic background, would all have equal access for economic success.
Figure 2: Uyghur family (Source: Radio Free Asia) |
Shortly thereafter, in the Xinjiang province road signs
written in Uyghur were removed, leaving only the Mandarin signs. The government also began sending out
official agents on short or long term exchanges to the Xinjiang province. They were sent under the guise of teaching
Mandarin among local groups, but these agents would report back to the
government on the level of Mandarin language proficiency in the population. Those who were deemed as lacking basic
proficiency were sent to “re-education camps”, of which the Chinese government
officially recognized as occurring in 2018.
In these camps detainees are forced to speak only Mandarin, go to
classes to renounce their faith in Islam, forced to eat pork (which is strictly
prohibited by their faith), among other activities. Various human rights groups have spoken out
against these camps, noting that a number of detainees have been killed or
disappeared as a result. Orphaned
children of detainees are sent to “boarding schools” where they are treated
similarly to their parents.
At the present time the Chinese government has made no moves
to end these re-education camps. Instead
they have doubled down their efforts by claiming that it is a national security
issue that requires them to keep the camps open. The Chinese government claims that if the
Uyghur are not assimilated into the dominant Chinese culture that they are at
risk of being recruited by unfavorable terrorists groups in the surrounding
regions. There has been no evidence to
demonstrate that the majority of the detainees are affiliated with terrorists
groups, however.
As previously noted language loss is evidence of cultural
loss, and in the case of the Uyghur their loss of language and culture is a symptom
of a larger problem: ethnocide. The
Uyghur who live outside of China are working diligently to preserve their
language and culture through various means, including publishing books and
teaching Uyghur language and culture courses.
Many are afraid to publicize these efforts for fear of retaliation
against family members still residing in China.
Together the endangerment of the Uyghur culture and language
demonstrates the power of loss.
Bibliography
Bouscaren, Durrie. "'We Need to Keep Our
Language Alive': Inside a Uyghur Bookshop in Istanbul." Pacific
Standard 9 April 2019. Electronic.
London Uyghur Ensemble. Uyghur language.
2013. Electronic. 24 June 2019.
No Author. Uyghur at Indiana University. No
Date. Electronic. 24 June 2019.
Shir, Rustem. "China’s Effort to Silence the
Sound of Uyghur." The Diplomat 16 May 2019. Electronic.
Sulaiman, Eset. "China Bans Uyghur Language in
Schools in Key Xinjiang Prefecture." Radio Free Asia 8 July 2017.
Electronic.
Thompson, Ashley. Uyghurs in America Aim To Keep
Language Alive. 19 February 2019. Electronic. 24 June 2019.
5 comments:
I wasn’t aware that a loss of language was a real thing until reading this article. It’s also very sad what China is doing with these “re education camps”. It’s bad enough that people’s religion are getting disrespected by making them eat pork, but the fact that this is also happening to kids makes it much worse. It’s like the present day Holocaust in China. -Malalia Siafa-Bangura
Hi,
These re-education camps are a disgrace to China. The consequences of not knowing how to speak a language are despicable. I cannot digest the idea that children were also treated this way. Very disturbing. Joell Davis
Wow, this is heartbreaking. I was under the assumptions that "camps" were done in 1945 when the holocaust was ended. This is happening currently and the government is calling it a national security issue which is 10x more disturbing.
For most of my life I’ve heard how China govern things in their country and have always been taken aback on how the US doesn’t interfere with these things but would go to the ends of the world to tidy up other countries and third world countries at that.
-Jesse Logan
The importance of language loss is clearly emphasized in the post, especially in light of the Uyghur minority group in China. The Chinese government's intentional attempts to eradicate language are presented as the cause of language loss, which highlights the ongoing difficulties minority languages confront in maintaining their linguistic and cultural legacy. By addressing Chinese government initiatives like bilingual education programs and reeducation camps, which have aided in the decline of Uyghur language and culture, the post offers insightful background. Readers are better able to comprehend the larger social and political dynamics influencing language loss in minority populations because of this political background.
Post a Comment