Ms. Ples (Diagnostic adult Australopithecus africanus): Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, South Africa |
By Esmeralda Salas, Anth 102: 1501
Each discovery
of hominid species brings with it a better understanding of modern human
origins. In the case of Raymond Dart’s
discovery in the early 1920s, findings can provide irrefutable information
about where humans evolved. Before
delving into a review of Australopithecus africanus, it is important to have
some historical context in order to appreciate its importance in relation to
human evolution.
Since the publication
of Charles Darwin’s The Descent of Man in
1871, the scientific community was aware of the idea that it was “more probable
that our early progenitors lived on the African continent than elsewhere”
(Darwin, 191). Many at the time, however,
believed that early humans had evolved in Europe or Asia; a belief supported by
the 1912 discovery of Piltdown Man of England. It would take nearly three
decades since Dart’s discovery for Pildown Man to be exposed as a hoax. This was also the same amount of time that it
took for Dart’s claims to be justified. Raymond
Dart revolutionized the idea of human evolution and provided evidence for
Darwin’s claims with the examination of a fossil skull, Taung Child that he had
obtained from a quarry in Taung, South Africa (Wayman). What he had in his hands that autumn of 1924 was
the first Australopithecine discovered; its namesake meaning “southern ape from
Africa.”
Australopithecus
africanus is an amalgamation of ape and human features. According to the Smithsonian Institution,
this species lived approximate 3.3 to 2.1 million years ago. The overall size of the body shows a degree of
sexual dimorphism as males are estimated to weigh about 41 kilograms and
measure 138 centimeters in height, while females are estimated at 66 kilograms
and 115 centimeters (Australopithecus africanus). Significantly smaller than a modern human, Australopithecus
africanus has other diminutive features.
The skull approximates human features, but it also reveals how much
development of the brain occurred since this species. The cranial skeleton reveals a brain case of
approximately 450-550 cc, a rounded vault lacking cranial crests, and a less
prognathic face (Stanford, Allen, and Anton, 261). This
comes in contrast to modern human brain capacity.
Much of the diet
Australopithecus africanus ingested is inferred by dental characteristics. The large, more developed front teeth and
range of motion of the jaw “were important in food processing, e.g., husking,
stripping, nipping, and cutting” (Sarmiento, Sawyer, and Milner, 96). Studies have also been made that reveal some
the possible foods that were consumed.
Enamel micro-ware analyses suggest food consumed by Australopithecus
africanus resembled that of modern chimpanzees; however unlike these apes, they
displayed an ability only unique to humans (Sarmiento, Sawyer, and Milner,
96).
Perhaps most
notable is the position of the foramen magnum, which is situated toward the
front of the skull and oriented downward (Australopithecus africanus). This is an important attribute because it is
what suggests bipedal locomotion in this species and is evidence of an ancestral
link to humans. Other fossils of this kind have demonstrated skeletal
structures that support bipedal locomotive pattern. STS 14, discovered by Robert Broom and John
T. Robinson in Sterkfontain, South
Africa, in 1947, is an incomplete skeleton consisting of several thoracic and
lumbar vertebrae, a pelvis, a sacrum, and pieces of a rib and a femur (STS 14).
This small-bodied creature had the ability to walk on two feet as the vertebrae
of the spine had a distinctive shock absorbing curvature characteristic of
other bipedal vertebrates (STS 14).
It is important
to note that other bones of Australopithecus africanus imply another element to
its locomotive pattern. A study by David
Green and Adam Gordon looked at different fingers of the hand, specifically a
distinct curvature of the phalanges.
What they concluded “suggests that arboreality would have been a
significant component of their regime” (Green and Gordon, 718). This characteristic again reinforces the
link between human and ape.
The discovery Taung
Child is an important contribution that steered human knowledge toward the
right path, despite having been overlooked at the beginning. Raymond Dart and those after him have enhanced
the understanding of what it means to be human. Though Australopithecus
africanus alone does not provide all the answers about human evolution, it does
represent an important branch of the hominin family tree.
Works
Cited
"Australopithecus Africanus."
Australopithecus Africanus. Smithsonian Institution, n.d. Web. 17
Apr. 2014.
Darwin, Charles. "Affinities and
Geneology." The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to
Sex.
London: John Murray, 1871. 191. Print.
Green, David J., and Adam D. Gordon.
"Metacarpal Proportions in Australopithecus Africanus." Journal
of Human Evolution 54.5 (2008): 718. Print.
Sarmiento, Esteban E., G. J. Sawyer,
Richard Milner, Viktor Deak, and Ian Tattersall. "The South African Fossil Cave Sites."
The Last Human: A Guide to Twenty-Two Species of Extinct Humans. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 2007. 96. Print.
Stanford, Craig B., John S. Allen, and
Susan C. Antón. "Early Hominins and Australopithecus."
Exploring
Biological Anthropology: The Essentials. 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson, 2013. 261.
Print.
"STS 14." Human Evolution by
The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program. Smithsonian Institution, n.d. Web. 18 Apr. 2014.
Wayman, Erin. "How Africa Became
the Cradle of Humankind." Smithsonian. Smithsonian
Institution,
17 Oct. 2011. Web. 18 Apr. 2014.
14 comments:
Esmeralda painted a vivid picture of the Australolopithecus africanus. I can see the small man now, all four and a half feet of tuang Child. It is astounding how much evolution has brought us into such a rich development of a species. Not only are we revolutionizing the world, but we can trace back how we began as a living being. To think that there used to be very small human-like creatures with the brain capacity similar to ours is simply astounding. It raises a lot of questions like how similar their characteristics were to humans? Were they civilized, war hungry, prosperous traders, and given their size did they have special ways to foraging? Given what we know about our own capabilities as humans it is truly amazing to think what the Australolopithecus africanus must have done in their time on earth.
The questions you ask have been and are being explored through a variety of means-by directly studying the bones themselves and through studies based on analogies by studying our primate relatives (e.g. chimpanzees, gorillas, bonobos, etc.). We cannot study our Hominid ancestors directly but we can study living apes as they have similar brain capacities and potentially intelligence levels. It's not the greatest analogy but it is what we have available to us at present.
This student's paper is amazing. She is very detailed and on point about the facts that have been published from many sources. When I took this class, it was difficult for me. I wish I would have had a study partner like her when I took the class. I mean, do people think that we just popped out of the ground all grown up? We all came from somewhere, and discovering where that is, is very interesting.
Esmeralda is one of the anthropology students at TMCC, and this was the second time I had her as a student. I believe she's going to make an amazing anthropologist some day.
This is a very informative and fluid paper. Again this helps me get a better understanding of what I need to do on my paper and also helps me get a vague outline of it. It is fun learning about these species that we may have evolved from.
Just remember that two species of hominids are ineligible for topics on this paper: A. afarensis ("Lucy") and H. neanderthalensis. :)
I like how she detailed Australopithecus africanus species in order to get a better understanding on the facial features
I cant believe it took 30 years to discredit the pildown man. Now a days it would take 30 mins to disprove that type of thing. What Progress...
This article is like that lab and how we took the time to look at actual skulls of them and take a look how the use to look. when we as humans say we have same features and how things have evolved around us as well. In the article it talk about how the brain capacity use to be larger and now look at us these days.
briana banuelos
anthro 102 1001
This paper was a pure pleasure to read.
This blog post helps alot with what we are learning in our power points this week and would help students understand the hominids better I believe. While reading this a few things gave me a better understanding of the characteristics of the skull.
Akwila Cooks
This article helped me understand a little bit more about Australopithecus africanus. This article is very helpful because trying to remember all the species is a bit challenging. Australopithecus africanus is very similar to humans in many ways.
Akwila, I'm glad that you found this post useful. This is part of the reason why I wrote the blog and part of the reason I feature student's work: to be helpful and useful teaching tools. :)
My name is Aleisha watts. I find this post interesting. The fact that people can trace back to the evolution of the first is impressive. It really shows how much we have grown as a species as a whole. Are intelligence and will power to keep evolving and discovering new things is so fascinating. It really makes me wonder how much this world will grow and evolve new species. This post has definitely helped me understand another aspect in a different way.
Post a Comment