First, in order to understand the effects of looting, one must first understand what exactly looting is. Looting is the unscientific and nonarchaeological removal of artifacts and cultural heritage items from archaeological/cultural heritage sites and/or museums. Looting does not have to occur by an individual in possession of the artifact or cultural heritage item but can occur by others who are known to be the possessor of the artifact or item. Individuals who purchase looted items are still participating in looting as they are the consumers of looted products and fuel the illicit antiquities trade.
Many individuals who participate in looting may not be aware of their role, particularly as cultural norms and values vary and often do not frown upon such acts, but there are some very real and negative consequences of looting that do affect everyone: archaeologists and the public at large. Archaeologists are affected by looting, particularly of actively excavated sites, because they lose potential information concerning the culture they are studying. This loss of information robs the archaeologist(s) of fulling understanding the past, which can cause misinterpretations of past cultures. These misinterpretations of culture and loss of our cultural past do not just affect archaeology but deprive the public of understanding the past. There is also a loss of cultural identity for groups that claim affiliation with the past culture under exploration. This consequence may not seem like it is a big deal, but it really is, particularly in cases where that history is necessary to verify land claims, legitimize cultural identity, or produce a better understanding of one's cultural identity caused by cultural loss.
Due to the public's appetite for "ancient artifacts", many looters have taken to purposefully copying artifacts that they find. These copies are often indistinguishable from the original, ancient or historical artifacts. I met a looter once who admitted that he had gotten so good at copying archaeologically local arrowheads that even he could not tell the difference between his copies and the originals he stole. These imitations are often sold as real, which he admitted to me he consistently did, and they pollute the "market" and record with inaccurate information about the past. Because of these inaccuracies, archaeologists are ethically required not to study or analyze artifacts from looted contexts because these artifacts cannot be verified as real or faked. The studying of faked artifacts risks producing inaccurate and/or misinterpreted information about past groups, which leads to the same problems mentioned in the previous paragraph.
Acts of looting negatively affect archaeologists and the public alike because these are illegal activities and therefore the perpetrators have no problem participating in other illegal acts, such as murder or terrorism. Several years ago, it came across the archaeological listserves that an archaeologist was killed in Peru by a looter. The archaeologist was simply walking the grounds of the archaeological site, surveying the area for future excavations, when she was shot to death by a looter who was terrified of being turned in. This risk is present for the general public, as well, at various archaeological sites around the world, as well. Visitors to the site of Chan-Chan in Peru are warned by the Site Employees not to deviate from the route on the map they are given as due to the potential for running into a "huaquero" and potentially falling victim to a very serious crime, including but not limited to murder.
In addition, the illicit antiquities trade has been linked to funding acts of terrorism (Art As Financing for Terrorists?, Der Spiegel, 2005). It was reported that one of the 9/11 hijackers sold "ancient artifacts" in order to fund his terrorism efforts. The illicit antiquities trade has also be linked to other serious crimes, such as drug trafficking. As previously mentioned, many of those who participate in looting activities also participate in other illegal activities, and the scale of these activities is poorly understood at this time due to the covert nature of all illegal activities.
What can you do in order to assist in stopping looting and the illicit antiquities trade? There are many things you can do, and these acts range from small to big, simple to more complex. A small and simple act is to NOT participate in the purchasing of "ancient artifacts". Many people believe that they are "saving the artifact" or "rescuing the past" by purchasing it. Once the artifact is removed from its original context in an unscientific manner, it is considered lost, and little to nothing can be done to save it. Save your money and do more good by not providing the market with consumers, which is believed to be one of the best ways of ending the illicit antiquities trade.
Another way to assist in this problem is become educated on your local history and area, as well as about the effects of looting, and, in turn, educate individuals around you about the real costs of looting.
Patronize museums and institutions that ethically acquire artifacts and cultural heritage items. Do not support or visit museums and institutions that do not participate in ethical research, excavations, or research.
Support campaigns against looting. Many local sites have anti-looting campaigns and initiatives associated with them, providing you a local resource to participate in. There are also larger organizations, such as SAFE, that address looting issues at a global scale. SAFE has several opportunities for individuals wishing to participate, ranging from public lectures to internships.
Ultimately, every small step against the illicit antiquities trade will help in resolving this and the related issues described herein. Believing that you can make a difference, no matter how small or how large, is the first and most profound step in ending looting. Coming together, each and everyone of us, can and will make a difference in ending looting and the illicit antiquities trade.
ADDENDUM (5/31/13): My friend's husband is currently excavating in Peru, and he posted the following about his excavation: The Loot Fairy. It is very appropriate to this post and couldn't have been better timed.
ADDENDUM (5/31/13): My friend's husband is currently excavating in Peru, and he posted the following about his excavation: The Loot Fairy. It is very appropriate to this post and couldn't have been better timed.