Works of art have existed among anatomically modern humans
and potentially our human ancestors for several centuries, and a few hundred cave
art pieces have been found across the Old & New World. Long believed to be fakes, cave paintings have
since been determined to be legitimate pieces created by our human ancestors,
demonstrating their intellect and creative prowess. Today’s blog post is dedicated to discussing
the subjects of and means of creating cave paintings. This blog post will not discuss the motivations
behind the creation of these cave paintings because this is a broad enough
topic for a separate (and future) blog post.
Figure 1: Altamira Cave Painting |
The first cave painting ever discovered was at Altamira in
Spain (Figure 1). It was originally
declared a hoax by many because it was believed that the artistic depictions
were too advanced for early humans to create.
As more painted caves were discovered, it became clear that the Altamira
cave was not a hoax but real evidence of human art work.
Cave paintings most commonly depict a variety of animals, followed
closely by people. Cave paintings
throughout Europe demonstrate a variety of local fauna, including bison, oxen,
horses, deer, mammoths, ibex, rhinoceros, lions, and bears. Each cave demonstrates variation in form and
style, demonstrating the differences among the artists. Extensive study of these artistic renderings has
demonstrated that they were not composed by childish hands but the skilled and
experienced imaginations of adults. These
paintings are not merely 2-dimensional depictions but appear to be moving,
animated pieces that demonstrate a precise eye and artistic mind, which provide
rare glimpses into the world of the past which we, as modern scholars and
viewers, may not have been able to see.
Figure 2: Female form in a cave in France, one of the oldest cave drawings of humans. |
Depictions of humans are also present in cave depictions,
although these depictions are not believed to be self-portraits. Generally, portrayals of humans are rare in
occurrence. One of the oldest cave
drawing with humans as the subject is found in France, and it is the outline of
the female form (Figure 2). This
depiction dates to around 25,000 years ago based on radiocarbon dating. This is not the only human depiction
found. Of all the European cave art
depictions involving humans, 78 % are males vs.
22% of which are female. And
there are differences in behaviors depicted among males and females. Males are most often depicted as active,
either running, walking, or dancing, whereas females are more static, lying or
standing in groups with other females.
Another depiction involving humans that is very common is
the depictions of hands. Hand prints, either
in the negative, which refers to outlines of hands (Figure 3) or positive, which refers to the form of the hand (Figure 4), are found in many
caves. They range in size and are
attributed to men, women, and children of all ages. It is unclear the meaning of all these
various types of depictions of humans.
Figure 3: Negative Handprints |
Figure 4: Positive Handprints |
We know through careful analysis of these paintings that the
paint was created with natural products, such as ochre, iron oxides, and
manganese dioxide. These elements were
ground into fine powders and mixed with a binding agent, such as grease,
marrow, saliva, or blood. Fingers,
wooden spatulas, and brushes of twigs and animal hair were used to apply the
paint to walls.
In conclusion, cave art represents some of the earliest art
creations of humans and our ancestors.
These pieces primarily focused on natural fauna of the region
surrounding the cave, followed closely by humans. Much like artists today they were
drawing/painting what they knew best, so these subjects should not be
surprising. They ultimately provide us
insights into the daily lives of our human ancestors, who took the time to
record their existence on the walls of caves, allowing us to know and
understand the past today.
References
Feder, Kenneth and
Park M. Human Antiquity: An Introduction to Physical
Anthropology and Archeology, McGraw-Hill.
43 comments:
It's cool that even today one of the first painting we learn as kids is to paint our hands. However, when it comes back to what these painting meant in ancient time, I dont think they stood for anything. I really think maybe they were just bored and passing time... you know?
Have there been any documentation of cave painting depicting anything religious or anything along those lines?
Will, I am a little surprised that you asked this question as we went over this information in Introduction to Anthropology about a month ago, but you will get a refresher in class this week. :)
I think that the human depictions are interesting. With the men being depicted as active, I'm sure there has to be down time for them. Wonder why no one illustrated them in a resting state?
LaTroya "Trey" Jamison
I know this may sound closed minded, but I always thought that the humans during that time period would seem skinny, fit, etc and not so similar to the current human's body shape.
To me, this is not a surprise that they used such tools and materials to make these interesting drawings. I recently watched a movie titled, "Apocalypto" where it was about the downfall of the Mayan kingdom. While watching the movie, I noticed they used such weird methods to take care of themselves when maybe hurt. This made me question why we are so quick to die with many more resources than the long days before now. In conclusion, this article proves my statement of them being very intelligent and creative through their time period, some may say more intelligent but that would be a great debate topic.
Actually, Apocalypto is a fictional account and not a good basis of Maya culture.
Through the multiple different caves that we have in the great state of Missouri have there been any interesting cave paintings in them or any great discoveries? Im hoping to go explore bridal cave over the summer.
I am not aware of any cave paintings in MO caves, although one of the state parks has petroglyphs.
i dont really think that any of the painting really stood or meant for anything. but i really do think the human depictions are interesting
Wow! They really did love their women with curves. Also I did not understand the positive and negative hand prints. What's so negative about the clustered hand prints?
Positive and negative refers to painting style, similar to film photography. When you see the full picture like you would in a photograph it's considered a positive image, whereas when you see the outline, like in a photo negative, it is identified as negative.
Its unbelievable that these art works were done so long ago and we still use these art Technics today. If I wouldn't have seen these paints then I wouldn't have known that people back then was capable of things like this. Another thing that stood out to me in this post is that when they made drawing of men, it was showing them as being the active by running, dancing, etc. and when it comes to women the only thing you see is basically porn. This still goes on in today's would also.
Brandon Allen
Is there a way that the drawing of a female (like shown in figure #2) can be a early form of Venus Figurines?
I am not completely sure how one could test that hypothesis, but with a properly defined scientific method inspired study it may be possible. :)
The hand prints are the most interesting to me because they refer to figure 3 as negative hand prints and figure 4 as positive hand print. And the paintings tell a story, so they negative hand prints tell that the time they spent on earth was probably pretty bad.
Dalyla Jordan
How exactly was a cave painting determined to advanced? i find it very interesting how everything was created with just one idea and then it came to life and developed into something much more as time went on
These paintings are considered advanced because they are not simple designs (e.g. stick figures), but they are instead stylized, three dimensional pieces that took time and care to craft and create. Many scholars did not believe our Archaic Homo sapiens ancestors could create such things, so they were much surprised to find these art pieces as that refuted their original ideas.
Do you know about how long these paints took? I don't see how they would have enough time to take the time to make advanced pieces of art work.
Cave scripts are so interesting to learn about. Figure 3 almost seems to depict fear or maybe power over something. I love all types of art, and ancient art is amazing.
I do not have that information and I do not know of anyone who may. Timing was one of the factors that made early scholars question whether or not these were real, but ultimately the time it takes to paint something is based on the skill of the painter. Therefore it may be difficult to figure out a specific amount of time needed to paint these.
I think the human depictions are very cool! Its very interesting to learn about different types of artifacts like these. If I think about, I think I ever seen any of these types of artifacts and paintings in like a museum or anything.
I think the cave paintings that were discovered in Altamira in Spain were very interesting to find when they were found. I think it would be interesting to actually go explore for cave paintings.
Jovie Black-
Cave art always have interested me, Ive always been curious to know the meaning of the different types of collages made. We kind of still use the hand print method still. Is the hand print art derived from them?
I find it kind of odd that majority men were the ones painting, just because i figured all men are hunting and gathering for their family's, what triggered their imaginative skills?
Cave art is very beautiful to begin with and to know that men are the people who are majority behind this is amazing. It's nice to know that the men didn't only do the hunting and gathering.
What are the pictures on the last figure? Are those symbols?
-Daisha Benton
Cave art is really beautiful to me because of the simple fact its different in many ways that art work is today
Do you believe that the pictures that were being painted differed depending on where they were found? I feel like some of these people saw different things in nature depending on the region or what part of the world they were from.
the negative hand prints and the positive hand prints stuck out to me because maybe those hand prints have a different meaning? as in the spiritual world. maybe they meant those spirits who were good and then those who where bad .
I think this blog is very interesting, especially the two figures 3 & 4 . I found it to interesting on how they would see the difference from positive and negative based off of the hand prints.
Ainya Lomax
The hand prints are exceptionally interesting to me; however i was not quite sure what it meant by "negative hand prints." Does this refer to them symbolizing bad luck or does it have to do with the quality of the hand print? I would love to stumble across a cave in Missouri and find artwork such as that. Its amazing to think of the amount of time they took to leave behind artworks such as the ones you listed above.
The art depictions might have been a way of communication. Most of the time we make assumptions that these depictions mean only one thing but we have to be willing to consider that maybe it was their way of teaching, communicating or marking territory. I personally agree that from the evidence of these depictions,it represents the natural fauna of the surrounding region. - Caleb mcconnell
I love seeing the female form from France. It makes me happy seeing her rolls! It's also really neat to think those handprints were from human hand's so long ago.
I personally believe the art drawn on the wall of caves are ways of communication among the people of that time and for the people that were to come. I saw my first cave in Hannibal MO in the fourth grade.
How long would it take them to paint the art work? Would they paint for fun or would they ever paint for strategy for hunting or other strategic needs?
I don't know if we can ever know how long each piece took to create each piece as that depends on a variety of factors that we cannot find out through the archaeological record. As for your other questions I believe there's a blog post that addresses them. :)
Amber Barnes
I remember doing a project at school related to this.It makes these amazing when you realize that a majority of these were done in the dark.
In cave painting most was animals and people closely drawn next to them cave painting was all around Europe demonstrate a variety of local fauna. Also the drawing of the female form in a cave in France was one of the oldest photos in cave drawing and was about 25,000 years ago.-Alexander Taylor
I have always been a fan a cave art just for the simple fact that I know that the cave art has some kind of meaning to it is telling some kind of story. I also wonder what made them decide to do the paintings on the cave walls was it maybe because they knew it would stay on there for a very long time which it did or we would not know the cave art existed . - Mykia Chaney
I enjoyed this cave art. Honestly it's cool how they were able to draw what they were seeing. You learn as a kid to paint with your hands. Its interesting to know they had a creative mind too
I don’t think people give our human ancestors enough credit for their cognitive abilities. Figure 2, negative handprints, looks potentially challenging, but very interesting to look at. I understand why people don’t think our human ancestors created these paintings but I don’t think we give them enough credit for these art pieces!
Makayla Peterman
I think cave paintings are cool, especially when they tell a story
-Kyla Thomas
Post a Comment