Saturday, January 26, 2019

Cultural Appropriation Unmasked: “Fairy Locks” and the Truth of Celtic & Viking Hairstyles


In a previous blog post the topic of cultural appropriation was addressed, and several examples of cultural appropriation were discussed, including the cultural appropriation of African American hair styles.  The debate about the appropriation versus “appreciation” of these hairstyles has continued to rage before and after I posted that piece, but the debate has evolved into a new area: cultural appropriation of African American hairstyles as justified through fairy locks.  This blog post will discuss what fairy locks are (or claim to be), as well as address the accuracy of the “evidence” that supporters of fairy locks use to support their claims as to how fairy locks are not cultural appropriation but instead a part of their own culture for centuries.


Figure 1: Fairy Locks (Source: Pinterest)

The concept of fairy locks comes from various European folklore.  Fairy locks are tangles and matts in hair caused by fairies or elves twisting and tangling hair of those who sleep, particularly those with long hair.  Several folktales speak of the ways that these entities would cause mischief to unsuspecting sleepers, and even William Shakespeare discussed this concept in his play, King Lear.  Aside from the source material derived from European folklore and Shakespeare the enemies of the Celts and Vikings, specifically the ancient Greeks, identified them as having “snakes” for hair.  There are indeed references to such identifications among the ancient Greeks, who also claimed that the Celts and Vikings were horses, pigs, and any number of other creatures that they saw as beasts of burden.  There was even a report of the ancient Greeks likening these outsiders to being satyrs, which was not a compliment much like the other, previously discussed pieces of information.   Today, individuals who subscribe to the concept of fairy locks claim that this was a normal and even preferred hairstyle among various European groups, including the Celts and Vikings, and modern subscribers “dread” their hair (Figure 1), claiming that they have a right to do so as their European ancestors had done it for centuries before.

When I first heard of fairy locks I was shocked by the claim that past Europeans “dreaded” their hair.  I was shocked because as someone who grew up in Europe and visited various museums as I was a lover of all things historical (as I aspired to be an archaeologist since before I started school) I do not recall ever seeing such hairstyles depicted in the archaeological record.  This is because there is actually no evidence in that record to support the claims by white fairy locks subscribers that the Celts or Vikings did dread their hair.  

Figure 2: Lindow Man (Photo from the Trustees of the British Museum)
  
The Celts wore their hair in a variety of ways, as evidenced by bog bodies/mummies.  These mummies of both men and women throughout Europe and Scandinavia are so well preserved that their clothing and hair styles remain intact, allowing scholars and viewers to review what their appearance was like as it is in essence frozen in time.  Based on this evidence we can see that the Celtic men preferred their hair cut short, most often in a bowl cut (Figure 2), whereas Celtic women wore their long hair in a variety of braids, sometimes adorning them with various trinkets and ornaments.  This could account for how and why the Greeks believed the Celts had snakes in their hair.  This is further supported by the evidence of the hair found of the Clonycavan Man, who is associated with having the “first mohawk” (Figure 3).  His hair was twisted (braided) and afixed to the top of his head through pine resin and plant oil gels.  His hair style is by far the most unique of the bog bodies.  Further archaeological and historical evidence further demonstrates that the preferred hair styles of the Celts were short hair for men and long, braided hair for women.   

Figure 3: Clonycavan Man (Source: Archaeology Magazine)

Hair was of great importance to Vikings, as noted through in their religion.  According to the Viking beliefs Loki, the trickster god, cut the hair of Siv, wife of Thor (god of Thunder), and Thor retaliated by almost killing Loki because the act of cutting Siv’s hair was such a grave offense.  Loki paid retribution to both Thor and Siv by creating hair of gold for Siv, which she wore proudly because it did not break or tangle.  The Vikings, who often preferred their hair long, would often leave it straight, up in ponytails or top knots, or worn in a series of braids, either laying straight or wrapped up in intricate hairstyles (such as wrapped around their heads or in tight buns).  This is evidenced in Viking iconography, such as statues (Figure 4) and tapestries.  Hair care was also of the utmost importance to the ancient Vikings, who were known to carry around hair combs in order to maintain untangled and well-kept hair.  Hair combs are found in various Viking sites-both in Scandinavia and outside of it-as well as buried with the deceased (as it was taboo to take another’s hair comb).  Taken together there is no evidence that the Celts or Vikings dreaded their hair.


Figure 4: Valkyrie from Harby (Source: Artifact, 2014)

As someone who is both European and has had (and currently does have) long hair I can attest to how easy it is to wake up in the morning and find several matts in one’s hair.  As a child this was a constant issue, primarily caused by improper care of my hair.  I am not the only one who has had this problem, though.  My sister had similar issues growing up, and I used to spend hours brushing a friend’s daughter’s hair, which went down to her back, to get rid of the knots and mats.  The reason her hair tangled and matted so easily was because, like me as a child, she did not properly brush her hair.  This explanation is far more plausible of an explanation for the concept of fairy locks than the notion that European populations “dreaded” their hair, which according to the archaeological and historical record the Celts and Vikings themselves would have seen as offensive and deviant.  Therefore, the claims that these groups did “dread” their hair is actually dishonoring their memory. 

This is not meant to demean the act of “dreading” hair among Blacks/African Americans.  This is part of their culture and an effective means of maintaining their hair.  It is part of their identity, which unfortunately due to a series of laws and the language associated with the act is often used against them.  This is why the act of “dreading” hair among non-Blacks/African Americans is often appropriation.  As noted in the previous post non-Blacks/African Americans who do this hairstyle are seen as trendy and cool, whereas Blacks/African Americans are seen as dirty and bad.  The evolution of the “dreading” debate into the fairy locks is just one more means of appropriation as well as misrepresenting and dishonoring the past.


Works Cited

Artifact. (2014, September/October). Archaeology Magazine.
Artifact. (2015, July/August). Archaeology Magazine.
Arwill-Nordbladh, E. (2016). Viking Age Hair. Internet Archaeology.
Lobell, J. A., & Patel, S. S. (2010, May/June). Bog Bodies Rediscovered . Archaeology Magazine.
Lobell, J. A., & Patel, S. S. (2010, May/June). Clonycavan and Old Croghan Men. Archaeology Magazine.
Mehta, A. (2017, February 17). Celtic Hair History. Retrieved from The Celtic Fringe: https://blogs.haverford.edu/celticfringe/2017/02/17/celtic-hair-history/
Riley, M. (1997). Hair, Jewelry, etc. Retrieved from Clothing of the Ancient Celts : http://www.marariley.net/celtic/SentToKass/Cosmetic.htm
Sherrow, V. (2006). Encyclopedia of Hair: A Cultural History. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Saturday, January 19, 2019

Want to Make Quick Money? Learn to Speak Another Language!




In today’s world there is a push against diversity and difference.  People cling to their own ways out of need to “maintain traditions”, and while I will never discourage someone from being who they are I will also encourage everyone to learn about other ideas and cultures outside of their own.  The reason for this is that there are benefits to learning about other cultures, such as gaining a greater understanding of the cultural diversity around oneself, learning new and innovative ways to solve common problems, and gaining a greater awareness of one’s own values and beliefs.  These same ideas can be applied to learning another language (or two), although this topic is not as readily discussed because many people believe that learning another language is difficult and not worthwhile.  While I will not say that learning another language is easy (it takes practice and hard work, much like many endeavors) I can say that there are some real biological, cultural, and financial benefits to learning another language (hence the attention-grabbing title of this post).  Here are the top five reasons why you should learn another language:


1) Learning another language exercises your brain, enabling you to more easily solve problems!  Yes, by learning another language you learn different approaches to understanding, which can assist you with not only learning the new language (as well as your native language) but also in making sound financial decisions, solving complex moral dilemmas, and even make you better in math!
 
2) Exercising your brain has real health benefits!  Several studies demonstrate that individuals who speak more than one language more often live longer, healthier lives.  Bilingual and multilingual patients are more likely to be diagnosed with dementia earlier (and thereby get treatment earlier), recover more quickly from a stroke, and live longer despite having Alzheimer’s.  This is all attributed to how language learning and acquisition affects the biological aspects of the brain, creating and fostering more of memory capacity and enabling one to better recover when the brain is assaulted.
 

3) Speaking multiple languages increases tolerance and acceptance of those different from you!  When you learn another language, you are not just learning the language but also the culture associated with that language.  This is evident in introductory foreign language courses, as well as in overarching foreign language programs.  By learning about the culture one gains a better understanding of how different but more importantly similar each culture is, thereby fostering tolerance (and even better) acceptance.
 

4) Bilingual and multilingual speakers are not only more accepting of others but also of themselves!  Bilingual and multilingual speakers are reported to have greater self confidence in themselves and less negative and destructive tendencies, which is attributed to have a greater cultural awareness of their own and other cultures.
 

5) Knowing other languages (and about other cultures) gives you an advantage in acquiring and keeping jobs!  Let’s face it-whether you like it or not (or even want to acknowledge it) there are thousands of languages spoken around the world, and we exist in a globalized, interconnected world.  Even if you do not know someone from a different country you can connect with them by sampling logging on to the internet.  Several of my (video) gamer friends connect with people around the globe quite regularly, and the United States is a country populated by various individuals either living in or visiting here who speak a variety of languages outside of English.  This means that being able to speak more than one language can be an asset when seeking employment.  I personally have known several individuals who got jobs with little to no experience in the area but quite simply because they were bilingual, beating out people with years of experience over them.  But don’t just take my word for it: studies year after year demonstrate that bilingual and multilingual speakers are making more money than individuals who only speak one language.


Given all of the benefits of knowing another language I encourage you to consider learning one.  You have a lot to gain and nothing really to lose (except time, but that is only if you do not dedicate yourself to actually learning the language). 

Bibliography

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2018, December 28). The Advantage of Being Bilingual. Retrieved from American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: https://www.asha.org/public/speech/development/the-advantages-of-being-bilingual/
Burton, N. (2018, July 28). Beyond Words: The Benefits of Being Bilingual. Psychology Today.
Department of Education. (2018, December 28). Talk, Read and Sing Together Every Day! The Benefits of Being Bilingual-A Review for Teachers and Early Education Program Providers . Retrieved from Department of Education: https://www2.ed.gov/documents/early-learning/talk-read-sing/bilingual-en.pdf
Smollin, M. (2018, December 28). Benefits of being bilingual. Retrieved from Grand View Blvd Elementary School: https://www.grandviewelementary.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=273447&type=d&pREC_ID=603239

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Battle of the Sexes: Men vs. Women on Vision


As an educator I am always the first to admit that my students teach me as much as I teach them (or at least hope to teach them), and this post is one of those examples as it is inspired by information that one of my Fall 2018 Introduction to Anthropology students shared with me.  I promised that student that I would look into this matter further as I was unfamiliar with it, and, to be honest, I had my doubts as to its legitimacy.  While the semester is now over it is better late than never (another comment I make to students) in regards to finally looking into the matter: do men and women differ biologically in regards to vision, and if so, to what extent?


Figure 1: Color vocabulary differences by sex/gender (Source: Ayman, 2017)

Anthropologically, we know that culture does play a role in the degree to which an individual recognizes color (Figure 1).  My dad jokes that my stepmother does not like going shopping with him because he never gets the colors right when she asked for a new article of clothing to try on (e.g. “Can you get me the magenta blouse?” and my dad returns with the maroon one).  At least in American (and many Western) culture(s) we can easily see these subtle color differences by looking at the color choices available in men’s versus women’s clothing (or for a real challenge, try picking out paint colors with someone of the opposite sex-note, not an exercise for the faint of heart).  Other studies have demonstrated that other cultures who put less emphasis on color differences (as evidenced in the lexicon of their language) there will not be a stark difference between males and females when it comes to color differentiation. 

The cultural differences in color identification are well known, but scholars focused more on biology were concerned about the overemphasis on the role of culture in this matter and sought to evaluate the potential biological contributions to this matter.  Two studies by Israel Abramov et al. utilizing a sample of American high school, college (undergraduate and graduate) students, and faculty members at Brooklyn College demonstrated statistically significant differences between men and women regarding their abilities to differentiate colors and to identify spatio-temporal variations.  Their research demonstrated that women are better able to distinguish color variations, often times seeing brighter colors than men.  Abramov and team believe this may be related to the fact that color genes are found on the X-chromosome, which could assist women (who have two X-chromosomes) and hinders men (who only have one X-chromosome).  It is well known in biology and medicine that genetically inherited color blindness is more common in men than women because this trait is a recessive one, and the presence of only one X-chromosome in men increase their likelihood of being color blind.  Unfortunately, the researchers could not sufficiently relate the differences in color differentiation to genetics, although their research seems to suggest as much.  They called for additional study on this matter.

Whereas women are better able to distinguish colors men are better able to identify spatio-temporal differences.  In other words, men are able to see color changes over greater distances as well as better adept at noticing movement (as a result).  This difference they attributed to our hominid ancestors and the roles that men and women took-withmen as hunter and women as gatherer.  Abramov et al. claimed that men as hunters would have a greater need to see over longer distances in order to identify potential prey and predators (so they do not become prey), which is a portion of their article that many popular science writers picked up on.  Unfortunately, Abramov et al. noted that these differences developed over time, and that children, particularly very young children, did not appear to have any biological differences that related to this difference between the sexes.  Therefore, it could be that men’s ability to see over greater distances was trained and fostered over time, whereas women, who are often times gatherers not out of choice but necessity (as they are the primary child rearers because women feed the children through breast feeding), would not have received that same level of training.  Therefore, it appears that while there may be some biological differences between men and women regarding this matter culture may account for some of the differences as well.

Ultimately, while we know that there are cultural differences when it comes to recognizing colors among various cultural groups and between men and women there is evidence to demonstrate that there is a biological component to these differences as well.  These differences are slight, but they appear to be culturally fostered, furthering the notion of the roles between men and women.  This overall demonstrates the need to study what it means to be human holistically in order to not fall into the trap that it is either nature (biology) or nurture (social/cultural) that makes any one person into who they are and to realize that it is most often a combination between biology and culture that defines each and every human on earth.

References

Abramov, I; Gordon, J.; Feldman, O; and Chavarga, A.  2012a.  "Sex & Vision 1: Spatio-Temporal Resolution."  Biology of Sex Differences 3: 20. 

Abramov, I; Gordon, J.; Feldman, O; and Chavarga, A.  2012b.  "Sex & Vision 2: Color Appearance of Monochromatic Lights."  Biology of Sex Differences 3: 21.

Ayman, S.  2017.  "Do Women See More Colors than Men?"  SciPlanet.com

Steffens, S.  2015.  "When It Comes to Color, Men and Women Aren't Seeing Eye to Eye." Psychology Today. April 8.