Saturday, January 24, 2015

Getting Into Your Genes: Explaining Mendelian Genetics & Punnett Squares



Genetics is the study of the mechanisms of inheritance, which broadly encompasses all sorts of topics.  Mendelian Genetics simply refers to the mechanism of inheritance between parent and offspring.  Tthe focus of today’s blog post: exploring and explaining Mendelian Genetics and (what many students loathe, although I love) Punnett Squares. 

Genetics is the study of the mechanisms of inheritance, but what exactly does that mean?  It means that people who study genetics are concerned with how organisms become what they are.  You may have heard it over and over again, but each individual is made up a series of DNA and genes.  DNA, which is short for the tongue twitching term deoxyribonucleic acid, is simply a molecule that carries our genetic code.  Our genetic code, or blue print of what we are supposed to look like and function (i.e. carnivores, herbivores, human, animal, plant, etc.), is coded for via our genes, which make up the building blocks of who and what we are.  You can think of DNA and genes in layman’s terms in the following way:

Figure 1: DNA is the blueprint and Genes are the pieces.  Image Source: Schroeder

The DNA is the instruction manual, while the genes are the pieces for that the instruction manual.  It is sort of like a model airplane or car or IKEA furniture (and just as frustrating sometimes) (Figure 1).  Depending on what type of DNA (instruction manual) you have, you may have a model for an animal or a plant, and more specifically a fish vs a goat or a rose vs poison ivy.  The genes are the pieces of the organism that dictate individual variations in the organism.  Let us take a rose for an example: the genes (or in simple terms, building blocks) dictate the type of fragrance, color, size, number of petals, etc. of the rose.   

Now Mendelian Genetics refers to mechanisms of inheritance between parent and offspring, and the term was coined by its discoverer, Gregor Mendel.  Now Gregor Mendel was not some award winning scientist.  He was simply a monk who had an interest in science and who spent his spare time gardening.  Through gardening and harvesting peas he began to notice that the plants had different colors of flowers (purple vs. white) and different seed coats (smooth vs. wrinkled).   He was inspired by this observation to breed the peas in his garden.  He soon discovered that the specific colors and seed coats (both different traits) he observed were passed down differently from parent to offspring, and these specific traits, which we now know as genes, were passed down through parent to offspring based on what the parents had available to them in their genetic code.  In other words, whatever genes the parents have are what will be passed down to the offspring, meaning a parent can only pass down what they have and not anything they do not have.  

Now each individual carries two sets of genes for each trait that they have, and the reason for this is because a male and female parent must contribute genes to produce offspring, which is from the female parent providing the egg and the male parent providing the sperm.  The sperm and egg cells (referred to in biological terms as gametes) carry copies of the parent’s genes that will be passed to the offspring, and the union of the sperm and egg produce a whole organism or an offspring.  Please see Genotypes vs. Phenotypes for more information regarding expression and genetic composition.

Now because of the pioneering work of Gregor Mendel we can predict, based on the physical appearance and genetic composition of parents, what the offspring will look like, and this is done through a process referred to as Punnett Squares.  Punnett Squares are used to determine potential inheritance of offspring of two parents, and basically it takes the genetic composition of each parent and demonstrates the potential genetic composition outcomes of the offspring.  It does this by demonstrating a 4 x 4 probability, thereby producing a 25% chance per square, of what the offspring could look like. 

Figure 2: Genes/Jeans of Parents (Image Source: Shutterstock)
To demonstrate, let us go back to the beginning and think about what happens to produce offspring.  The male and the female each have their own set of genes, which are represented as pairs of blue jeans in Figure 2.  I chose this analogy because you have to remember that each individual has two genes per trait, and blue jeans have two legs.  The male and the female meet and they decide (knowingly or unknowingly) to reproduce.  To produce the offspring their bodies have produced their corresponding gametes (males produce sperm and females produce eggs).  Each of these gametes contains copies of one gene from those pairs of genes from each parent.  But since both parents carry two genes per traits, how do we know which gene is passed on to the offspring?  Through a Punnett Square analysis!

We know that each parent can only supply one gene to their offspring, so we can think of the gametes (sperm or egg) as being one pant leg, each representing one of the genes contained in the pair for each trait.  But we still do not know which pant leg the offspring will get.  So what we do is we put each pant leg in the Punnett Square as shown in the Figure 3:

Figure 3: Punnett Square 1.0.  Note: Males are typically at the top of the Punnett Square, whereas females are at the side, which is how it is presented here and why there is a blue vs red line (for male and female, respectively). This is not standard and you can invert the male and female placement.

Each of the mini squares (of which there are four in total) represents a 25% chance of what the offspring will look like because each parent can potentially give each offspring one of the two genes each parent carries, leading to a possibility of four outcomes because each parent can only give one gene to their offspring.  Now when Punnett Squares are done for professional purposes one does not actually use jeans to represent genes.  Instead, genes are represented by letters, so an actual Punnett Square would look like the following (Figure 4):
Figure 4: Punnett Square 2.0

Figure 4: Punnett Square 2.0.  For an explanation of the letters please go to the Genotypes vs. Phenotypes post.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how we predict what potentially the offspring will look like.  Now it is important to remember a couple of things about Punnett Squares: They only demonstrate the probability of what your offspring could look like for an individual trait.  They cannot predict specifically how exactly your offspring will look like.  As noted in the previous post, Brief Review of Genetics, a few factors are at play when it comes to physical expression of traits, specifically those that are environmental in nature.  But Punnett Squares are useful in predicting what your offspring may look like or what genes they may have. 

References:

Feder, Kenneth and Park M. Human Antiquity: An Introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archeology, McGraw-Hill.

28 comments:

Johanna Trelles said...

I think that genes can also come in sets, because I have completely cloned my husband and his sister with my son and daughter. They are picture duplicates. However their personalities are very similar to my family members.

Anonymous said...

I really like how you used the jeans/genes reference. I was able to clearly understand the probability ratios. This is actually a relevant topic in my own household because my husband and I both have brown hair. He has hazel eyes and I have brown. Both of our mothers have dark hair and dark eyes. Both of our fathers have light hair and light eyes. Our son has blonde hair and bright blue eyes. Next time I get asked where my kid gets his blonde hair, I'll tell them to research punnet squares! Mary Spencer Anth 102 1001

Anonymous said...

This was helpful, and easy to understand. That was clever using Jeans to depict Genes. I was actually talking to someone about GMO's and the peas experiment with the Monk. --MB

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

MB...please email me to provide me with your full name if you are not comfortable providing it here so that extra credit can be administered appropriately.

Anonymous said...

Thank you. This was very helpful to clear things up a little :) Sarah Howard

Anonymous said...

The jeans did help me a lot more then just talking about genes in the punnett squares. Thanks

April B said...

Punnet Squares were my favorite part of Physical Anthropology. The jeans/genes example is a great way to help understand them.

Anonymous said...

I understand that DNA has sone sort of code in each living thing, however I don't understand the Punnet Square. I have always known that there has to be a dominat and a reccesive trait. How do I figure what goes in what square?
Briana Banuelos Anth 102 1001

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

Well, Briana, remember that DNA is the blueprint and genes are the parts. Each gene, therefore, represents one part of the whole, meaning there are genes for eye color, hair color, nose structure, etc. Whatever alleles are present in an individual can potentially be passed down to the offspring. We will go over this more in Lab 2 and Chapter 2. This post was just explaining punnett squares to get you, the students, familiar with the concepts since I find students understand the basic concepts of inheritance (that traits are passed from parents to offspring) but not specifically how to create and interpret a punnet square. Don't worry as the review in both lab and lecture classes will be exhaustive and hopefully fun.

Unknown said...

Interesting how you used jeans as an example, my question is, how accurate are the punnet squares when determining how the offspring will look like?
Silvia Garcia Anth 102 1001

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

As long as one accurately knows the genotype (genetic make up) of the parents one can get an accurate probability of what the offspring could look like. Now you have to keep in mind that just because there is a 75% probability of the offspring looking one way does not mean that the 25% won't occur. It really is up to chance and hence why I use the term probability. We will go further into this matter with a real life example in class, along with some in class activities to further demonstrate that point.

Anonymous said...

Now that I know a little more I wanted to know how to make a punet square beacause I rember in another class I had there was a white rabit and other one with white and brown spots. How can that be intreperted as in the punet square. We will learn more about this correct.
Briana Banuelos Anth 102 1001

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

Yes, Briana, we will be going over this in class, and we have already begun discussing this information with Chapter 2. Have you had an opportunity to read the chapter yet? It provides an exhaustive review of this information, and it will be very useful for Lab 2, which we will begin on Tuesday.

Unknown said...

Anthropology 102:1002
Thanks for the in depth discussion of the Punnett square and helping us to understanding it using a fairly easy example. I'm sure this will help with labs, and assignments to come.

Anonymous said...

I have learned about Punnett squares in previous classes, and your analogy to the jeans and the visual explanation was very good and a great explanation of how genetic probabilities work.

-Courteney Hedicke, Anth101

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

Thank you, Courteney. It's always good to hear that my teaching methods are effective because if they aren't then I need to alter them so that they are.

Cami Cazier said...

Using the jeans in the punnet square is a much better visual than the letters. I never would have thought to use this. My sister is in junior high and just recently learned about genetics. This is something I will definitely show her!

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

Glad the metaphor works.

Anonymous said...

I always loved Punnett squares, but using actually jeans for genes in genius in my opinion. It creates a much more fun learning experience for people who don't quite understand Punnett squares. I know I didn't until we used SpongeBob example in high school.

Very cool article

Zachary Forrester
anthro 101 3001 summer

Jordan R said...

It would have been awesome if in middle school they had us using little jean pictures such as this to create the diagrams, way more entertaining.
Jordan R

Matt Arnold said...

After helping teach little ones at the Discovery museum, I feel I now have a very strong concept of Mendelian Genetics and using Punnett Squares. Teaching is the best way to learn the subject!

Anonymous said...

The jeans was very helpful , it help understand it a lot more than just being in class and the teacher is talking about it.
Aaliyah Caldwell

Betsy Britt - Introduction to Anthropology SA-202 said...

I love Punnett squares! However, the one showed in Figure 4 is a really simple one; it only has one type of gene from each parent, such as hair color, but it can be increased to more (eye color, skin tone, etc). The biggest problem when trying to complete a Punnett square is the fact that one essentially has to find out the genes of the parents and possibly the grandparents.

D.Traywick said...

This is a good explanation of punnet squares. It's comedic and reminds me of the "n v" blog and it's ironic that jeans are used to represent genes.

Unknown said...

Your analogy on punnett squares are very helpful. Although, I understood what punnett squares to begin with but you made me look at it different.

Ashley Jacobson said...

I can remember the first time I learned about genetics and i was so fascinated with the fact of how it all works. I think it is beyond incredible how we are formed and how our bodies work. I am very interested in the biology on our functioning.

Unknown said...

I love how you used the jeans/genes reference to help explain how the Punnett squares show probabilities. I have learned about Punnett squares in high school but never in depth. I am excited to learn more about genetics!
Makayla Peterman

Anonymous said...

I also did some basic research and this is the breakdown:
Autosomal Dominant

Each affected person has an affected parent
Occurs in every generation
Autosomal Recessive

Both parents of an affected person are carriers
Not typically seen in every generation
X-linked Dominant

Females more frequently affected
Can have affected males and females in same generation
X-linked Recessive

Males more frequently affected
Affected males often present in each generation
Mitochondrial

Can affect both males and females, but only passed on by females
Can appear in every generation

-Jasmine Busby