Saturday, June 18, 2016

Baby Bust: A Review of Ancient Contraceptives



Women can be fertile up to forty years, and in that length of time many things can change.  These changes do affect a woman’s desire to get (or not) getting pregnant.  Emotional readiness, population control, financial stability, social/cultural preferences, health/medical well-being, and more are all reasons that affect a woman’s desire to carry a pregnancy to term.  The concern with preventing pregnancy is a long standing one that has existed for centuries, and it has not been until recently that pregnancy prevention has advanced to provide a safe outcome.  The failures of the past, however, are what have led to the successes of the present, and today’s blog post will discuss the past technologies for contraception. 

Figure 1: A Sea Sponge Pessary


One of the most common means of birth control is coitus interruptus, or more popularly known as the withdrawal method.  The earliest mention of this method is attributed to several sources, including the Biblical Old Testament, the Persian physician Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi, and Master Tung-H’suan of ancient China.  Despite its poor results it continues to be advocated for today.  The Chinese and ancient Indians (of India) also advocated for a related technique known as coitus obstructus, which is a technique where men would put pressure on their testicles to stop sperm from entering the woman.  The ancient Egyptians, however, recognized a successful means of preventing pregnancy, which is the continuation of breast feeding.  This prevents ovulation and reduces the likelihood of the mother becoming pregnant again.

Vaginal suppositories and pessaries, devices meant to block the passage of sperm into the vagina, were also common in the past.  These took various forms, ranging from conservative to quite bizarre (by our modern standards).  African women were known to use plugs of chopped grass or cloth, Japanese women employed bamboo tissue paper, Middle Eastern, Slavic, and Greek women stuck simply to cloth, while Jews in the past utilized a sea sponge wrapped in silk (Figure 1).  Meanwhile, women in New Zealand women put rocks in their vaginal canal to prevent pregnancy.  More unconventional products used as pessaries included a mixture of crocodile dung, honey, and sodium carbonate (baking soda), which formed into a gum.  This was quite popular among ancient Egyptians.  Ancient Romans utilized a similar concoction, without the crocodile dung, when attempting to prevent pregnancy.  Pessaries eventually evolved to mixtures utilizing a variety of other chemicals, including potassium carbonate, ammonium chloride, coco butter, and quinine, some of which was used quite recently in the historical record as a means of preventing pregnancy.

Figure 2: Linen Condoms were commonplace among ancient Egyptians
Related to vaginal suppositories were condoms, which were common throughout history but not in the incarnation that they are known today.  The earliest recorded incidence of condom use was in 3000 BC and is associated with King Minos Crete who utilized goat bladders as a means of preventing exposure to venereal diseases.  Beginning at about 1000 BC ancient Egyptians began employing linen as a means of protecting themselves from venereal diseases (Figure 2).  Other sources claim that cave paintings and other historical documents make mention of condoms, although the connection to preventing pregnancy was not realized until recently.

Last but not least people believed that certain herbal remedies could prevent pregnancy and even in some cases cause infertility.  One of the most popular herbal remedies was silphium, a fennel plant that was indigenous to modern day Libya.  This plant was so highly promoted as having contraceptive properties that it was eventually made extinct due to overharvesting of the plant.  After this occurred, other herbal remedies were used, including rue, Artemisia, majoram, parsley, thyme, lavender, worm fern, and Queen Anne’s lace (Figure 3).  Dioscorides, a Roman physician, identified the following, when consumed, would lead to women being unable to conceive: white poplar and mule kidney, willow, asparagus, pepper, ivy, mint, and axe-weed.  Ancient Romans also believed that a drink concocted of hare’s stomach would lead to infertility, as well as wearing a cat’s liver would prevent conception.  

Figure 3: Queen Anne's Lace was believed to be a plant that prevented pregnancy
The lengths that people went to prevent pregnancy demonstrate a long history of a desire to control birth outcomes.  As ancient scholars rightly recognized at the time preventing pregnancy was safer than abortions, which were common when preventative methods failed.  Today we recognize the same exists today, but at least contraceptives used today, thanks to medical advances, have become more reliable and safer.

Bibliography

Davidson, E.R.W.  2012.  No Title.  Hektoen International: A Journal of Medical Humanities.  http://www.hektoeninternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=211&Itemid=627

Dowsing, S.  1999.  Contraception and Abortion in the Early Roman Empire: A Critical Examination of Ancient Sources and Modern Interpretations.  Master’s Thesis: University of Ottawa.

Evans, M.L. 2008.  “A Desire to Control: Contraception Throughout the Ages.”  Historia Medicinae.  1: 1-4.


London, K. 2016.  “The History of Birth Control.”  Yale-New Haven Teacher’s Institute.  http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1982/6/82.06.03.x.html

No Author.  No Date.  “13.2: Birth Control in Antiquity.”  http://www.uic.edu/classes/osci/osci590/13_2%20Birth%20Control%20in%20Antiquity.htm

Saturday, June 11, 2016

Sound Off!: Phonetic vs. Phonological Analyses



N      V
I want you to start reading this blog post by stating the above letters out loud.  Go on, I am not going to judge you.  These are two very simple letters, but when you say them together, what do they sound like?  Say it again and listen carefully.  Do you hear it?  (See the bottom of this post for answer.)  This is a good lead in to this blog post’s primary topics: understanding the differences between phonetics and phonology.  The discussion will focus on the differences in the terms and how each provides insights into the understandings of language and culture.

Phonetics and phonology are two of the most basic levels of understanding language.  Phonetics focuses on speech sounds, or what and how people say the sounds that make up specific words in any language.  These are made up of phonemes, which are the smallest units of sound that differentiate meaning in a language.  Understanding phonetics and the phonemes of any language is the first step to understanding a language.  One must inventory the sounds of the language in order to learn how to speak it, which is why the first thing children learn is the alphabet and the sounds each letter of the alphabet make.  Each language has a set of phonemes, ranging from 15 to 65.  Linguists identify specific phonemes that exist in languages by studying minimal pairs, which are words that sound similar but differ in one letter or sound.  An example of a minimal pair is bet vs vet-the v and b are the difference in the words and are also what differentiate the words from each other (as the former means a wager whereas the latter refers to an animal doctor or former military personnel).  Understanding phonemes is important because not all languages have the same phonemes, such as the case with Bushman languages, which have click sounds that are not discernable in most other languages, or the lack of the r sound that is common in Germanic and Romance languages (e.g. English & French) but not in Japanese.

Building on phonetics is phonology, or the study of speech sounds.  Phonology allows other studies of language (e.g. lexicon, morphology, etc.), the meanings attached to specific sound constructions (such as the word play example above), as well as provides insights into socio-linguistics as social attitudes do vary regarding specific accents and intonations.  In English culture Cockney accents tend to be looked down upon, and in American culture the Valley girl dialect leads to each statement sound like a question based on the location of the intonation, leading to it being viewed negatively.  Furthermore, because phonology focuses on the placement of speech sounds into specific words it allows scholars to get insights into language and culture.  For example, words that sound similar but have different meanings are a topic that is explored within phonology.  Another specific area of study is when different language speakers come in contact with each other and influence pronunciation.  This also provides insights into cultural changes, traditions, norms, and values that may result from these cultural confrontations. 

Overall, phonetics and phonology are the basic foundations of linguistic studies as they provide insights not just into language sounds but also language meaning.  Understanding of phonemes, the smallest units of sound, is the most basic area of study within these two linguistic studies, but they ultimately lend information to the greater understanding of sociolinguistics through accents and intonation.

(N V sounds just like envy, which is a play on words of a local store that inspired this post.)  

Bibliography

Coleman, J.  No Date.  “Phonetics vs. Phonology”.  http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/jcoleman/PHONOLOGY1.htm


Gezon, L. and C. Kottak.  2014.  Culture, Second Edition.  New York: McGraw Hill.

Haviland, W.A., H.E.L. Prins, D. Walrath, B. McBride.  2011.  Anthropology, The Human Challenge, Thirteenth Edition.  Belmont: Wadsworth.



Moore, A.  2002.  “Phonology: The Study of Speech Sounds.”  https://www.teachit.co.uk/armoore/lang/phonology.htm



No Author.  2004.  “What Is Phonology?”  SIL International.  LinguaLinks Library.  http://www-01.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsPhonology.htm

Tan, P.  No Date.  “What is Phonology?”  EL2111: Historical Variation in English.  https://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elltankw/history/phon/a.htm