The
following is written by Srikavi Premnath, a former student
in SA 202: Introduction to Anthropology. In one of the course assignments students were provided a scenario where they had to imagine that they were paleoanthropologists who just discovered a new hominid species, and they had to explain what parts of the body they would focus on to make the case that their new species was indeed part of the hominid lineage. Please show your
appreciation for Srikvai's hard work through the comments.
By: Srikavi Premnath
During my fieldwork
in the African continent, I discovered the latest hominid species, which I
named Earthensis megalisis. The species featured a less-pronounced
sagittal keel, pelvis, and unique hand structure. My team and I happened upon
this species while studying the ancient habitat of the group that had inhabited
the region Megallion. Throughout this report I will explain the cranium, the
pelvis, and the two hands I had uncovered along with my team. These structures
were chosen from the overall skeleton to compare the structural aspects to the
modern human. Additionally, these hominid remains provide insight into the
various species leading to the modern human species and in this report, I will
explore these comparisons.
We discovered the cranium
of Earthensis megalisis first. The cranium featured a sagittal keel, which
is a “raised area in the mid-cranium” (Welsch, Vivanco, Fuentes, 2017). The
sagittal keel has become even less-pronounced in the modern human, perhaps only
viewed by the sagittal suture. I have learned from my anatomical coursework that
the sagittal suture connects the bones of the two halves of the cranium. I
chose the cranium, specifically the sagittal keel, to examine because of the possible
connection between the structure of the sagittal keel and the present sagittal
suture. The possible connection seen in the example, “Homo erectus exhibited
sagittal keels in some of the fossils found. These fossils were discovered in Africa
and among many other regions of the world” (Welsch, Vivanco, Fuentes, 2017). Although
the cranium may suggest the species relates to Homo erectus, the pelvis discovered
may suggest another relative.
The pelvis
recovered from the site exhibited a pronounced iliac crest. I recalled from my
anatomy coursework the pelvic bone exhibits certain differences in features
such as width and overall size. The width and size contrasts between males and
females. “Modifications to the pelvis creating a stabilizing pelvis” (Welsch,
Vivanco, Fuentes, 2017) have contributed to the movement of the species as
well. These pelvic modifications aided in the ability to move more efficiently.
The sexual dimorphism present suggest the relation to Australopithecus africanus,
which had, “a pelvis better for bipedalism than that of Australopithecus
afarensis,” (Welsch, Vivanco, Fuentes, 2017). This provides evidence for
improvement in mobility with the change in pelvic structure. Australopithecus
africanus additionally possessed, “pronounced sexual dimorphism,” (Welsch,
Vivanco, Fuentes, 2017). The present pelvic structure also includes differences
in males and females. My anatomy coursework noted the key factor in the differences
are the ability of women to bear a child and the structure in the pelvis of
women supplements the child-birth process. While examining the pelvis Australopithecus
africanus may seem to be a distant relative to Earthensis megalisis;
nevertheless, the hands must be examined to ensure this species can be
considered a distant ancestor to humans.
The hands were
discovered after the pelvis in the excavation process. The hands most
importantly suggest dexterity improvements among various lineages. The hands
produce the ability to hold items, create objects, and much more. Homo
habilis could relate to Earthensis megalisis possibly because they
featured, “a gripping hand for tool use,” (Welsch, Vivanco, Fuentes, 2017). The
ability to hold a tool suggests the dexterity improvements I had discussed. The
present hand structure consists of carpals, metacarpals, and phalanges
according to my anatomy coursework. These divisions lend to the overall
dexterity and ability to perform multiple tasks such as writing and playing an
instrument. I should note Homo habilis is among the various species
which posses the advanced capabilities of the hand. Australopithecus sediba
whose, “grasping hand suggests possible tool use,” (Welsch, Vivanco, Fuentes,
2017). The hands discovered from Earthensis megalisis could relate to
either Homo habilis or Australopithecus sediba; however, further
investigation and discovery of fossils will provide more definite answers.
In conclusion, many
fossils led to the recovery of Earthensis megalisis. The cranium, pelvis
and hands were examined further to find distant relations to other recorded
hominid characteristics. The sagittal keel of the cranium reminded me of the
sagittal suture of the present. Homo erectus possessed the sagittal keel
in some of the fossils uncovered. Next, the pelvis provided insight into sexual
dimorphism and contrasting abilities due to pelvic structure. Australopithecus
africanus possessed sexual dimorphism characteristics and greater mobility.
Finally, the structure of the hands provided clues to understand the advanced
dexterity. Homo habilis and Australopithecus sediba had the
ability to hold objects. The fossils were chosen to suggest Earthensis
megalisis may be a distant relation to the present human.
Reference
Welsch, R. L.,
Vivanco, L. A., & Fuentes, A. (2017). Anthropology: Asking Questions
About Human Origins, Diversity, and Culture. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.