Saturday, January 16, 2021

Name Calling: Names of Cultural Groups that You Should No Longer Use

The problem with ignorance is that one does not know something, leading them to be ignorant, but ignorance can be resolved through the acquisition of new knowledge.  The purpose of this blog post is to provide you, the reader, with information to help you resolve some of your ignorance, specifically when it comes to the common names used for minority ethnic groups.  These names may seem benign and non-harmful, but the reality is that they are steeped in racist origins and have been continually requested to be discontinued in our everyday language.  This post will discuss the terms, “Gypsy”, “Eskimo”, and “Berdache”, addressing the origins, meanings, and reasons why these terms should no longer be used.

 

Gypsy

The term gypsy has grown in meaning in recent years, particularly in American, Canadian, and Western cultures.  It is commonly used to represent someone with a carefree spirit, a love for travel, an affinity toward nature and the arts, and more, but the reality is that this term also conjures up very negative ideas and stereotypes, including individuals who are thieves, mystics, seducers, and liars.  This term is also commonly used to refer to the ethnic minority group known as the Roma or Romani.  This ethnic group has faced centuries of persecution, enslavement, forced assimilation, and genocide, and unfortunately, their troubles persist as they continued to be discriminated against in health care, housing, employment, education, and more. 

 

A large part of the reason why their troubles because the idea of being a “gypsy” suggests there is a personal choice in these behaviors: people choose to be thieves, sexual deviants, to lie, practice magic, etc.  The reality is that the Roma and their culture are anything but these ideas.  Yes, there are a few individuals who opt to participate in these activities (as they exist in any group), but the Roma culture is not one characterized on these deviant acts.  The association with the term “gypsy” and these acts, however, are not easily divorced, and whenever someone is identified as being Roma or Romani and in essence a “gypsy” they are treated negatively and unfairly.    

 

The more recent rebranding of the term “gypsy” to one of carefree individuals into the arts, nature, music, etc. is equally problematic.  This rebranding actually negates and erases the long history of persecution and genocides execute against the Roma or Romani over the centuries.  It also serves as a way of ignoring the current abuses against them that continue throughout the world.  These are several of the reasons why the Roma or Romani request that the term “gypsy” no longer be used and it be as taboo as other ethnic and racial slurs, instead of normalized and adopted as another appropriate word.

 

Eskimo

The term “Eskimo” has recently drawn attention as various products no longer use this term.  Pies, mascots, and even gestures have been criticized for the use of this offensive term, which is an ethnic slur against Indigenous populations of Alaska and the Canadian, Siberian, and Greenland Arctic.  The specific origin of the term “Eskimo” is imprecisely known, although it is clear that it is not a term derived from the native languages of these indigenous populations.  Some linguists believe the term came from Ojibwa, an indigenous language spoken by groups along the Canadian-US border.  Other linguists cite a French origin, claiming the term refers to “snow shoe netter” based on the shoes worn by these groups.  Other linguists cite the word means “Ex-Communicated” and was meant to point out the non-Christian identity of the Indigenous people.  Still others claim that the term refers to cannibals.  Regardless of the origins and original meanings of the term Indigenous populations of Alaska and the Canadian, Siberian, and Greenland Arctic identify the term as being a colonial name and prefer to be called “Inuit” or “Yupik”, based on their respective tribal names that come from their own indigenous languages.

 

Berdache

If you have an interest in art, queer studies, human sexuality, or anthropology then you probably have come across the term “Berdache”.  This term has long been known for its problematic nature when in 1993 a group of anthropologists and Indigenous groups came together and formally coined a new term, Two-Spirit, meant to replace it.  The term “Berdache” has always been an offensive term, and it was one imposed upon Indigenous populations as a term of judgement against them.  The term comes from either French or Persian and ultimately means “boy slave” or “male prostitute”, neither of which were meant to uplift but instead demean individuals who are held in great esteem among various Indigenous groups. 

 

Works Cited

Alaers, Jill. " Two-Spirited People and Social Work Practice." Critical Social Work (2010). Electronic.

Hersher, Rebecca. "Why You Probably Shouldn't Say 'Eskimo'." 24 April 2016. NPR. Electronic. 8 December 2020.

Kaplan, Lawrence. "Inuit or Eskimo: Which name to use?" n.d. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska-Fairbanks. Electronic. 8 December 2020.

Naomi P. "The “G” Word Isn’t for You: How “Gypsy” Erases Romani Women." 2 October 2017. National Organization of Women. Electronic. 8 December 2020.

Reidy, Jessica. "The Harmful History of “Gypsy”." 11 August 2017. Bitch Media. Electronic. 8 December 2020.

Smith, Gwendolyn. "This historical painting shows a celebration of gender diversity. The title is a slur." 27 October 2018. LGBTQ Nation. Electronic. 8 December 2020.

 

Saturday, January 9, 2021

Apes vs. Monkeys: How to Tell the Difference

 


Students of mine will hopefully remember some important lessons from my classes, including one of my biggest pet peeves: when people confuse monkeys (example pictured left) and apes (example pictured right).  This is a sore subject that comes up not only in my physical/biological anthropology classes but also in my introductory anthropology courses.  I often go into the appropriate amount of detail explaining this (depending on the primary subject matter of the course), but ultimately it is this lesson that inspired this blog post, in which you will learn all about the differences between monkeys and apes.

 

First, it is important to recognize that monkeys and apes all fall within the taxonomic order known as primates, which is reviewed here.  These is a great deal of species variety within the Primate Order, including but not limited to Tana River Mangabey to the various species of orangutans.  There are common biological characteristics that link all primates into the order, but there are distinctive biological differences formed from years of evolutionary change that help differentiate monkeys and apes.  These include the following:

·         Presence or Absence of a Tail:  Typically, monkeys have tails, whereas apes do not.  Apes will have the anatomical components for a tail, but these typically end as part of the sacral vertebrae (or butt area).  If you see a primate with a tail chances are it is a monkey, not an ape.

·         Overall Body Size: Apes are typically much larger than monkeys.  They are wider, taller, and heavier than monkeys, despite often residing in the same or similar environments.

·         Overall Brain Size: Apes also typically have larger brains.  This does not mean that monkeys are less intelligent, although monkeys have not yet been able to demonstrate an ability to learn sign language as apes have been.

·         Locomotion Differences: Monkeys and apes move differently.  Monkeys tend to run through the trees quadrupedal walkers, whereas apes tend to swing through the trees, typically being identified as brachiators or knuckle walkers.

·         Genetic Relationships to Humans: Believe it or not, but humans are considered apes, meaning that all of the ape species are more closely related to each other genetically than they are to monkeys.

 

There you have it: the knitty gritty (or most of it) that covers the differences between primates known as monkeys versus apes.  Hopefully you will not continue to make that mistake when you happen to see a primate (such as at the zoo; if you are so lucky, on vacation where nonhuman primates exist; or are in my presence.)  😉

 

 References

Robert Jurmaine, Lynn Kilgore, Wanda Trevathan, Eric Bartelink.  Essentials of Physical Anthropology.  Cengage.