Saturday, February 17, 2018

Big Boned: A Review of the Paranthropus Genus

Figure 1: Paranthropus aethiopicus
 
One of the things humans across several different cultures often times wonder about is where we (humans or individuals) come from.  This is a central question to paleoanthropologists who study human origins.  Through the study of the biological lineages of human ancestry there are several twists and turns in species that have long gone extinct but who may have (or may not have) contributed to who and how we identify Homo sapiens today.  Today's blog post will discuss one genus of potential human ancestors: the Paranthropus genus.

The Paranthropus genus refers to a group of hominid species characterized as having small brains, robust (i.e. large) cranial features who subsisted on an exclusively vegetarian diet.  These species were at one time classified as Australopithecines (and sometimes still are), but because of their unique robust cranial features some scholars believe they should be classified as a separate genus.  If you were to look into them further you will want to be aware of this so you do not miss out on information as not all scholars agree to the Paranthropus designation and therefore still refer to them as Australopithecines.

Figure 2: Paranthropus robustus
 
Paranthropus species are found primarily in the Lake Turkana region of Kenya, although one (Paranthropus robustus) is found in South Africa.  They are all characterized by sharing several cranial features, including postorbial constriction (a narrowing of bone behind the eye sockets, which is common in nonhuman primates), large molar teeth and smaller canines, exaggerated sagittal crests (a boney ridge, or mohawk as I like to refer to it, along the midline of the skull), broad cheeks that flare out, and a flattened/dished face.  Their large cranial features, particularly their molars, made them specifically adapted to eating specialized vegetarian diets that other contemporaneous hominids could not eat.  They subsisted largely on hard nuts, roots, and other vegetative matter that we, modern humans, cannot easily eat raw or without some sort of assistance (e.g. a nut cracker or by cooking the food to soften it).   

There are three known Paranthropus species: Paranthropus aethiopicus (Figure 1), Paranthropus robustus (Figure 2), and Paranthropus boisei (Figure 3).   To the untrained eye there are very few differences that distinguish them from each other, but there are actually very distinct differences that allow one to identify who they are and how they are different.  P. aethiopicus has the smallest brain, largest sagittal crest, and most prognathic (jutting forward) face of the three.  Despite his name P. robustus is not the most robust of all the species, although P. robustus does have some of the heaviest jaws.  Plus, as previously mentioned it is the only species found in South Africa (based on current knowledge).  P. boisei was actually named after the investor who assisted Louis and Mary Leakey discover it, has the largest geographical range, and is considered "hyperrobust" in all of its cranial and facial features. 




Figure 3: Paranthropus boisei
So there you have it.  Some information on the Paranthropus genus, as well as details to help you be able to differentiate them.  If you are interested in learning more about these species please check out this excellent review video.  Also, for those who may be wondering how do these species fit into our human lineage I can only say that we are still trying to figure that completely out.  There are some scholars who believe they are an evolutionary dead end, and others who believe at least one of them added to our gene pool and evolution to produce us as we are today.  As more data is collected and more discoveries made we will hopefully have a more definitive answer about how these species fit into our family tree.

References

Jurmain, Robert, Kilgore, Lynn, Trevathan, Wenda, Ciochon, Russell L. Introduction to Physical
Anthropology. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 2014. Print.


14 comments:

Monya' Smith said...

If we did inherit a gene from at least on of these Paranthropus then there must be a missing link in between the three Paranthropus. If they did find a missing link would that solve the evolution theory? Also, the blog said that all three Paranthropus was found in Africa in different locations, do you think that there are more then these three Paranthropus just in different places in the world or other parts of Africa? Could the missing link solve these questions?
—Monya’ Smith

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

We will go into more depth on human evolution in an upcoming chapter, but to address your questions now I need to start by clarifying what the missing link refers to. When anthropologists say missing link we are referring to the species that first gave rise to all humans and differentiated us from other primate species. That specific species predates the Paranthropus genus by quite a bit. Regarding the Paranthropus species we are not quite sure how exactly they fit into our human lineage, but we do know that they are in it. As for their geographical expanse we do not have evidence at this time to suggest they existed outside of Africa.

Chadijah McShan said...

Is it possibility that there might be more than just these three Paranthropus because there are different types of primates in the world such as lemurs, apes, and gorillas. All of these primates are in the same family tree but look, eat, and act different from one another. --Chadijah McShan

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

Yes, actually. There are some scholars who don't believe that these species should be classified as Paranthropus but instead as Australopithecus, a debate we will explore further in class. It is also possible that we haven't discovered all of the species that fit into this genus.

Unknown said...

I do not agree with the statement that some scholars made about how theses animals "are an evolutionary dead end, and that others who believe at least one of them added to our gene pool and evolution to produce us as we are today.

If this type of evolution was to happen then i believe we would have noticed animals evolving around the world today and that we would also have irrefutable evidence to back it up.

Dr. Christine Elisabeth Boston said...

There is actually quite a bit of evidence of evolution occurring both in the past and today. Just over the past week and a half we have addressed the evolutionary changes that have occurred in humans, and we know that even more changes have occurred more recently (e.g. a reduction in the number of red heads, reduction in law size, and more). Regarding animals there are the Galapogos finches, which is one of the most frequently cited examples of evolution. I personally prefer to use the example discovered by a friend and colleague, Dr. Andrew Ravenilli. He did his undergraduate thesis trscint the evolution of new Minnow species. Two species of minnow had been geographically isolated and then brought together by human intervention. No one thought that the minnows would breed (they did) or that the offspring would breed (they did). Since they breed and continue to do so they're not only a new species but evidence of evolution. I encourage you to look more into this topic so you can learn more and be better informed about what evolution is and is not. :)

Anonymous said...

I don’t know why but I feel as if there is more than three. It has to be more. I just can’t fully believe that it’s only three and I would like to find out myself if I knew what I was doing - Alexis Buford

Jasmine Busby said...

I agree with you (Alexis Buford) There has to be more than 3. We have to look at the fact that there are more primates who are all in the same family but act different from one another. I would like to learn more about this.

Taylor Morris said...

I believe there are more than 3 as well. I have never heard of the Paranthropus genus. I would be interested in learning more about them.

Unknown said...

I'm actually interested in learning more about the Paranthropus Genus. I believe there is more than three. I'm curious to see what people would find if they do find anything.


-Tae'lor Pearson

Malacia Lowe said...

I want to learn more about the Paranthropus Genus. I'm intrigued to further my knowledge because I believe there is more than just three.

- Malacia Lowe

Unknown said...

Hi my name is Avery Davis,and I think this blog is so interesting. This was discussed in class about the different shapes of the skulls. do you think our skulls would evolve?

Renée Wade said...

I agree, the search just has to be continued in order to find out of there is more than three.

Anonymous said...

This is my first time hearing of the Paranthropus Genus. I definitely think there is more than three. I'm actually interested in learning more.
-Kyla Thomas