Saturday, April 22, 2017

Cave Art: The World’s First Art Galleries



Works of art have existed among anatomically modern humans and potentially our human ancestors for several centuries, and a few hundred cave art pieces have been found across the Old & New World.  Long believed to be fakes, cave paintings have since been determined to be legitimate pieces created by our human ancestors, demonstrating their intellect and creative prowess.  Today’s blog post is dedicated to discussing the subjects of and means of creating cave paintings.  This blog post will not discuss the motivations behind the creation of these cave paintings because this is a broad enough topic for a separate (and future) blog post.

Figure 1: Altamira Cave Painting

The first cave painting ever discovered was at Altamira in Spain (Figure 1).  It was originally declared a hoax by many because it was believed that the artistic depictions were too advanced for early humans to create.  As more painted caves were discovered, it became clear that the Altamira cave was not a hoax but real evidence of human art work. 

Cave paintings most commonly depict a variety of animals, followed closely by people.  Cave paintings throughout Europe demonstrate a variety of local fauna, including bison, oxen, horses, deer, mammoths, ibex, rhinoceros, lions, and bears.  Each cave demonstrates variation in form and style, demonstrating the differences among the artists.  Extensive study of these artistic renderings has demonstrated that they were not composed by childish hands but the skilled and experienced imaginations of adults.  These paintings are not merely 2-dimensional depictions but appear to be moving, animated pieces that demonstrate a precise eye and artistic mind, which provide rare glimpses into the world of the past which we, as modern scholars and viewers, may not have been able to see.

Figure 2: Female form in a cave in France, one of the oldest cave drawings of humans.

Depictions of humans are also present in cave depictions, although these depictions are not believed to be self-portraits.  Generally, portrayals of humans are rare in occurrence.  One of the oldest cave drawing with humans as the subject is found in France, and it is the outline of the female form (Figure 2).  This depiction dates to around 25,000 years ago based on radiocarbon dating.  This is not the only human depiction found.  Of all the European cave art depictions involving humans, 78 % are males vs.  22% of which are female.  And there are differences in behaviors depicted among males and females.  Males are most often depicted as active, either running, walking, or dancing, whereas females are more static, lying or standing in groups with other females.    

Another depiction involving humans that is very common is the depictions of hands.  Hand prints, either in the negative, which refers to outlines of hands (Figure 3) or positive, which refers to the form of the hand (Figure 4), are found in many caves.  They range in size and are attributed to men, women, and children of all ages.  It is unclear the meaning of all these various types of depictions of humans.

Figure 3: Negative Handprints
Figure 4: Positive Handprints
       
We know through careful analysis of these paintings that the paint was created with natural products, such as ochre, iron oxides, and manganese dioxide.  These elements were ground into fine powders and mixed with a binding agent, such as grease, marrow, saliva, or blood.  Fingers, wooden spatulas, and brushes of twigs and animal hair were used to apply the paint to walls. 

In conclusion, cave art represents some of the earliest art creations of humans and our ancestors.  These pieces primarily focused on natural fauna of the region surrounding the cave, followed closely by humans.  Much like artists today they were drawing/painting what they knew best, so these subjects should not be surprising.  They ultimately provide us insights into the daily lives of our human ancestors, who took the time to record their existence on the walls of caves, allowing us to know and understand the past today.

References

Feder, Kenneth and Park M. Human Antiquity: An Introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archeology, McGraw-Hill.

43 comments:

  1. It's cool that even today one of the first painting we learn as kids is to paint our hands. However, when it comes back to what these painting meant in ancient time, I dont think they stood for anything. I really think maybe they were just bored and passing time... you know?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Have there been any documentation of cave painting depicting anything religious or anything along those lines?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Will, I am a little surprised that you asked this question as we went over this information in Introduction to Anthropology about a month ago, but you will get a refresher in class this week. :)

      Delete
    2. The art depictions might have been a way of communication. Most of the time we make assumptions that these depictions mean only one thing but we have to be willing to consider that maybe it was their way of teaching, communicating or marking territory. I personally agree that from the evidence of these depictions,it represents the natural fauna of the surrounding region. - Caleb mcconnell

      Delete
  3. I think that the human depictions are interesting. With the men being depicted as active, I'm sure there has to be down time for them. Wonder why no one illustrated them in a resting state?

    ReplyDelete
  4. LaTroya "Trey" Jamison

    I know this may sound closed minded, but I always thought that the humans during that time period would seem skinny, fit, etc and not so similar to the current human's body shape.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Christopher McFaddenApril 24, 2017 at 7:38 PM

    To me, this is not a surprise that they used such tools and materials to make these interesting drawings. I recently watched a movie titled, "Apocalypto" where it was about the downfall of the Mayan kingdom. While watching the movie, I noticed they used such weird methods to take care of themselves when maybe hurt. This made me question why we are so quick to die with many more resources than the long days before now. In conclusion, this article proves my statement of them being very intelligent and creative through their time period, some may say more intelligent but that would be a great debate topic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, Apocalypto is a fictional account and not a good basis of Maya culture.

      Delete
  6. Through the multiple different caves that we have in the great state of Missouri have there been any interesting cave paintings in them or any great discoveries? Im hoping to go explore bridal cave over the summer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not aware of any cave paintings in MO caves, although one of the state parks has petroglyphs.

      Delete
  7. i dont really think that any of the painting really stood or meant for anything. but i really do think the human depictions are interesting

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wow! They really did love their women with curves. Also I did not understand the positive and negative hand prints. What's so negative about the clustered hand prints?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Positive and negative refers to painting style, similar to film photography. When you see the full picture like you would in a photograph it's considered a positive image, whereas when you see the outline, like in a photo negative, it is identified as negative.

      Delete
  9. Its unbelievable that these art works were done so long ago and we still use these art Technics today. If I wouldn't have seen these paints then I wouldn't have known that people back then was capable of things like this. Another thing that stood out to me in this post is that when they made drawing of men, it was showing them as being the active by running, dancing, etc. and when it comes to women the only thing you see is basically porn. This still goes on in today's would also.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Brandon Allen

    Is there a way that the drawing of a female (like shown in figure #2) can be a early form of Venus Figurines?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not completely sure how one could test that hypothesis, but with a properly defined scientific method inspired study it may be possible. :)

      Delete
  11. The hand prints are the most interesting to me because they refer to figure 3 as negative hand prints and figure 4 as positive hand print. And the paintings tell a story, so they negative hand prints tell that the time they spent on earth was probably pretty bad.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dalyla Jordan

    How exactly was a cave painting determined to advanced? i find it very interesting how everything was created with just one idea and then it came to life and developed into something much more as time went on

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These paintings are considered advanced because they are not simple designs (e.g. stick figures), but they are instead stylized, three dimensional pieces that took time and care to craft and create. Many scholars did not believe our Archaic Homo sapiens ancestors could create such things, so they were much surprised to find these art pieces as that refuted their original ideas.

      Delete
  13. Do you know about how long these paints took? I don't see how they would have enough time to take the time to make advanced pieces of art work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not have that information and I do not know of anyone who may. Timing was one of the factors that made early scholars question whether or not these were real, but ultimately the time it takes to paint something is based on the skill of the painter. Therefore it may be difficult to figure out a specific amount of time needed to paint these.

      Delete
  14. Suzanne HendricksonApril 28, 2017 at 11:56 AM

    Cave scripts are so interesting to learn about. Figure 3 almost seems to depict fear or maybe power over something. I love all types of art, and ancient art is amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think the human depictions are very cool! Its very interesting to learn about different types of artifacts like these. If I think about, I think I ever seen any of these types of artifacts and paintings in like a museum or anything.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think the cave paintings that were discovered in Altamira in Spain were very interesting to find when they were found. I think it would be interesting to actually go explore for cave paintings.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Jovie Black-
    Cave art always have interested me, Ive always been curious to know the meaning of the different types of collages made. We kind of still use the hand print method still. Is the hand print art derived from them?

    ReplyDelete
  18. I find it kind of odd that majority men were the ones painting, just because i figured all men are hunting and gathering for their family's, what triggered their imaginative skills?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Cave art is very beautiful to begin with and to know that men are the people who are majority behind this is amazing. It's nice to know that the men didn't only do the hunting and gathering.

    ReplyDelete
  20. What are the pictures on the last figure? Are those symbols?

    -Daisha Benton

    ReplyDelete
  21. Cave art is really beautiful to me because of the simple fact its different in many ways that art work is today

    ReplyDelete
  22. Do you believe that the pictures that were being painted differed depending on where they were found? I feel like some of these people saw different things in nature depending on the region or what part of the world they were from.

    ReplyDelete
  23. the negative hand prints and the positive hand prints stuck out to me because maybe those hand prints have a different meaning? as in the spiritual world. maybe they meant those spirits who were good and then those who where bad .

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think this blog is very interesting, especially the two figures 3 & 4 . I found it to interesting on how they would see the difference from positive and negative based off of the hand prints.
    Ainya Lomax

    ReplyDelete
  25. The hand prints are exceptionally interesting to me; however i was not quite sure what it meant by "negative hand prints." Does this refer to them symbolizing bad luck or does it have to do with the quality of the hand print? I would love to stumble across a cave in Missouri and find artwork such as that. Its amazing to think of the amount of time they took to leave behind artworks such as the ones you listed above.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I love seeing the female form from France. It makes me happy seeing her rolls! It's also really neat to think those handprints were from human hand's so long ago.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I personally believe the art drawn on the wall of caves are ways of communication among the people of that time and for the people that were to come. I saw my first cave in Hannibal MO in the fourth grade.

    ReplyDelete
  28. How long would it take them to paint the art work? Would they paint for fun or would they ever paint for strategy for hunting or other strategic needs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know if we can ever know how long each piece took to create each piece as that depends on a variety of factors that we cannot find out through the archaeological record. As for your other questions I believe there's a blog post that addresses them. :)

      Delete
  29. Amber Barnes
    I remember doing a project at school related to this.It makes these amazing when you realize that a majority of these were done in the dark.

    ReplyDelete
  30. In cave painting most was animals and people closely drawn next to them cave painting was all around Europe demonstrate a variety of local fauna. Also the drawing of the female form in a cave in France was one of the oldest photos in cave drawing and was about 25,000 years ago.-Alexander Taylor

    ReplyDelete
  31. I have always been a fan a cave art just for the simple fact that I know that the cave art has some kind of meaning to it is telling some kind of story. I also wonder what made them decide to do the paintings on the cave walls was it maybe because they knew it would stay on there for a very long time which it did or we would not know the cave art existed . - Mykia Chaney

    ReplyDelete
  32. I enjoyed this cave art. Honestly it's cool how they were able to draw what they were seeing. You learn as a kid to paint with your hands. Its interesting to know they had a creative mind too

    ReplyDelete
  33. I don’t think people give our human ancestors enough credit for their cognitive abilities. Figure 2, negative handprints, looks potentially challenging, but very interesting to look at. I understand why people don’t think our human ancestors created these paintings but I don’t think we give them enough credit for these art pieces!
    Makayla Peterman

    ReplyDelete
  34. I think cave paintings are cool, especially when they tell a story
    -Kyla Thomas

    ReplyDelete

Comments and questions are welcome. Please remember that this blog is public and anyone, including your professor, your parents, your employer, and maybe even your grandmother, can and will read whatever you post. In other words, be polite, courteous, and constructive. Comments are moderated to ensure that spam is not posted. Your comments are appreciated and will be made public within a couple of days, but threatening or hateful comments will not be made public (and further follow up as necessary will be taken). Thank you for your cooperation.